Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38361218›Full record

ArticleMultivariate behavioral research

Improving the Walktrap Algorithm Using

Michael Brusco, Douglas Steinley, Ashley L Watts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multivariate behavioral research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael BruscoBusiness Analytics, Florida State University.
Douglas SteinleyPsychology, University of Missouri.
Ashley L WattsPsychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University.

Funding

Resolving sources of heterogeneity and comorbidity in alcohol use disorderR00AA028306 · NIAAA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WATTS, ASHLEY L. · 2023 to 2025
$745k
Resolving the AUD Phenotype: Unique and Transdiagnostic Features and Genetic HeterogeneityK99AA028306 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI WATTS, ASHLEY L. · 2021 to 2022
$249k
NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA028306NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA028306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The walktrap algorithm is one of the most popular community-detection methods in psychological research. Several simulation studies have shown that it is often effective at determining the correct number of communities and assigning items to their proper community. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that the walktrap algorithm relies on hierarchical clustering because it was originally developed for networks much larger than those encountered in psychological research. In this paper, we present and demonstrate a computational alternative to the hierarchical algorithm that is conceptually easier to understand. More importantly, we show that better solutions to the sum-of-squares optimization problem that is heuristically tackled by hierarchical clustering in the walktrap algorithm can often be obtained using exact or approximate methods for

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputer Simulationcommunity detectionhierarchical clusteringK-means clusteringPsychological networkswalktrap algorithm

Identifiers

PMID38361218
PMCPMC11014777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.