Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38360983›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2024

Association between ultra-processed food and snacking behavior in Brazil.

Maria Fernanda Gombi-Vaca, Euridice Martinez-Steele, Giovanna Calixto Andrade, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada, Renata Bertazzi Levy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of ultra-processed food in obesity.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Fernanda Gombi-VacaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, SP, 01246, Brazil. maria.gombi@uconn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-4305
Euridice Martinez-SteeleCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health (NUPENS), University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, SP, 01246, Brazil.
Giovanna Calixto AndradeCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health (NUPENS), University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, SP, 01246, Brazil.
Maria Laura da Costa LouzadaCenter for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health (NUPENS), University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, SP, 01246, Brazil.
Renata Bertazzi LevyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455, São Paulo, SP, 01246, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUltra-processed food may play a role in facilitating snacking behavior because of their convenience and low satiety potential. This study aimed to describe the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and frequency of snacking.

methodsWe analyzed data from 46,164 participants (≥ 10 years old) in the 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. Dietary data were collected by 24-h dietary recalls over one or two days for each participant. We estimated energy intake, ultra-processed food consumption, and level of snacking. We measured the association between ultra-processed food consumption and level of snacking using multinomial logistic regression, stratified by age group (adolescents, 10-19 years old; adults, 20-64 years old; elders, 65 or older).

resultsWe found a statistically significant tendency of increased daily energy intake and consumption of snacks and that ultra-processed food consumption was positively associated with the level of snacking for all age groups. For adolescents, adults, and elders in the highest quintile of ultra-processed food consumption as a share of their entire diet, the relative risk ratio (95% CI) of having more than two snacks per day compared to no snacks was 14.21 (9.09-22.21), 4.44 (3.54-5.57), and 4.21 (2.67-6.64), respectively, when compared to the lowest quintile.

conclusionHigher consumption of ultra-processed food was associated with snacking behavior, and the strength of this association was stronger among adolescents. Efforts to mitigate ultra-processed food attributes that facilitate snacking should be incorporated into strategies to promote healthier food choices, especially among adolescents.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFast FoodsFeeding BehaviorSnacksAdolescentAdultAgedBrazilChildDietFemaleFood, ProcessedHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAdolescentsDietary surveyFrequency of eatingSnackingUltra-processed food

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.