Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38360962›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

"Good Care Is Slow Enough to Be Able to Pay Attention": Primary Care Time Scarcity and Patient Safety.

Shannon Satterwhite, Michelle-Linh T Nguyen, Vlad Honcharov, Aoife M McDermott, Urmimala Sarkar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Empathy, communication, and a human touch in clinical practice.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shannon SatterwhiteDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Michelle-Linh T NguyenDivision of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Vlad HoncharovDivision of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aoife M McDermottSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Urmimala SarkarDivision of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Urmimala.Sarkar@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4213-4405
San Francisco General Hospital · USAston University · GBUC Davis Health · US

Funding

Commonwealth Fund Harkness Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing, widespread recognition that expectations of US primary care vastly exceed the time and resources allocated to it. Little research has directly examined how time scarcity contributes to harm or patient safety incidents not readily capturable by population-based quality metrics.

objectiveTo examine near-miss events identified by primary care physicians in which taking additional time improved patient care or prevented harm.

designQualitative study based on semi-structured interviews.

participantsTwenty-five primary care physicians practicing in the USA. APPROACH: Participants completed a survey that included demographic questions, the Ballard Organizational Temporality Scale and the Mini-Z scale, followed by a one hour qualitative interview over video-conference (Zoom). Iterative thematic qualitative data analysis was conducted. KEY

resultsPrimary care physicians identified several types of near-miss events in which taking extra time during visits changed their clinical management. These were evident in five types of patient care episodes: high-risk social situations, high-risk medication regimens requiring patient education, high acuity conditions requiring immediate workup or treatment, interactions of physical and mental health, and investigating more subtle clinical suspicions. These near-miss events highlight the ways in which unreasonably large patient panels and packed schedules impede adequate responses to patient care episodes that are time sensitive and intensive or require flexibility.

conclusionsPrimary care physicians identify and address patient safety issues and high-risk situations by spending more time than allotted for a given patient encounter. Current quality metrics do not account for this critical aspect of primary care work. Current healthcare policy and organization create time scarcity. Interventions to address time scarcity and to measure its prevalence and implications for care quality and safety are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, Primary CareQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareTime Factorsnear-missprimary carequalitysafetytime scarcitywork design

Identifiers

PMID38360962
PMCPMC11255151
OpenAlexW4391836465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.