ArticleScientific reports2024
Dynamic person-position matching decision method based on hesitant fuzzy number information.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In view of the fact that people pay more and more attention to the principle of "getting the position according to the person" and "adapting the person to the position" in person-position matching, a dynamic person-position matching decision method based on hesitant fuzzy numbers is proposed. First, the dynamic person-position matching problem with hesitant fuzzy numbers is described. Then, according to hesitant fuzzy evaluation matrices of positions and candidates, expected score matrices of bilateral subjects are calculated. Furthermore, based on the idea of the generalized optimal order method and the dominant correlation and the missing correlation coefficients, satisfaction means of people and positions are calculated. According to satisfaction means, growth satisfactions at each period are obtained, and then the exponential decay formula is used to determine weights of growth satisfactions. Dynamic satisfactions of bilateral subjects are calculated by aggregating initial satisfaction means and growth satisfactions. On this basis, a stable person-position matching model considering dynamic satisfactions is established and then is solved to obtain the optimal stable person-position matching scheme. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified by an example analysis of person-position matching. Main contributions of this paper are as follows: an effective calculation method for the missing correlation coefficient is presented; a novel effective calculation method for dynamic satisfactions is proposed by introducing the correlation parameter to combine the missing correlation coefficient with the dominant correlation coefficient; an effective stable person-position matching model considering dynamic satisfactions is established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.