Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38360939›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2025

Ethnic and Gender Differences in Sun-Related Cognitions Among College Students: Implications for Intervention.

Charlotte J Hagerman, Michelle L Stock, Mary C Jobe, Laura A Dwyer, Amy E Houlihan, Ellen W Yeung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte J HagermanWeight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science (WELL) Center, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9386-8444
Michelle L StockDepartment of Brain and Psychological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2013 H St NW, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5224-1103
Mary C JobeDepartment of Brain and Psychological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2013 H St NW, Washington, DC, USA. maryjobe@gwmail.gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-7120
Laura A DwyerDepartment of Brain and Psychological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2013 H St NW, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-563X
Amy E HoulihanTexas A&M University, Corpus Christi, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3884-4535
Ellen W YeungDepartment of Brain and Psychological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2013 H St NW, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-7962
George Washington University · USDrexel University · USTexas A&M University – Corpus Christi · US

Funding

National Science Foundation DGE-1246908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin cancer incidence and prognosis vary by ethnicity and gender, and previous studies demonstrate ethnic and gender differences in sun-related cognitions and behaviors that contribute to this disease. The current study sought to inform skin cancer interventions tailored to specific demographic groups of college students. The study applied the prototype willingness model (PWM) to examine how unique combinations of ethnic and gender identities influence sun-related cognitions.

methodUsing data from a survey of 262 college students, the study tested whether self-reported sun-related cognitions were different for White women, Hispanic women, White men, and Hispanic men. Path modeling was also used to identify which PWM cognitions (e.g., prototypes, norms) were the strongest predictors of risk and protection intentions and willingness in each demographic group.

resultsSeveral differences in sun-related cognitions and PWM pathways emerged across groups, emphasizing the need for tailored skin cancer education and interventions. Results suggest that, for White women, interventions should primarily focus on creating less favorable attitudes toward being tan.

conclusionInterventions for Hispanic women may instead benefit from manipulating perceived similarity to sun-related prototypes, encouraging closer personal identification with images of women who protect their skin and encouraging less identification with images of women who tan. For White men, skin cancer interventions may focus on creating more favorable images of men who protect their skin from the sun. Lastly, interventions for Hispanic men should increase perceived vulnerability for skin cancer.

Indexed as

CognitionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSkin NeoplasmsStudentsSunbathingSunlightAdolescentAdultFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleSex FactorsUniversitiesWhiteYoung AdultEthnicityPrototype willingness modelSkin cancerSun protectionTanning

Identifiers

PMID38360939
OpenAlexW4391838524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.