Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38360918›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A hybridized red deer and rough set clinical information retrieval system for hepatitis B diagnosis.

Madhusmita Mishra, D P Acharjya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madhusmita Mishra *Vellore Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore, 632014, India.
D P Acharjya *Vellore Institute of Technology, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore, 632014, India. dpacharjya@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare is a big concern in the current booming population. Many approaches for improving health are imposed, such as early disease identification, treatment, and prevention. Therefore, knowledge acquisition is highly essential at different stages of decision-making. Inferring knowledge from the information system, which necessitates multiple steps for extracting useful information, is one technique to address this problem. Handling uncertainty throughout data analysis is also another challenging task. Computer intelligence is a step forward to this end while selecting characteristics, classification, clustering, and developing clinical information retrieval systems. According to recent studies, swarm optimization is a useful technique for discovering key features while resolving real-world issues. However, it is ineffective in managing uncertainty. Conversely, a rough set helps a decision system generate decision rules. This produces decision rules without any additional information. In order to assess real-world information systems while managing uncertainties, a hybrid strategy that combines a rough set and red deer algorithm is presented in this research. In the red deer optimization algorithm, the suggested method selects the optimal characteristics in terms of the degree of dependence on the rough set. In order to determine the decision rules, further a rough set is used. The efficiency of the suggested model is also contrasted with that of the decision tree algorithm and the conventional rough set. An empirical study on hepatitis disease illustrates the viability of the proposed research as compared to the decision tree and crisp rough set. The proposed hybridization of rough set and red deer algorithm achieves an accuracy of 91.7% accuracy. The acquired accuracy for the decision tree, and rough set methods is 82.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. It suggests that the proposed research is viable.

Indexed as

DeerHepatitis BAlgorithmsAnimalsInformation SystemsUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID38360918
PMCPMC10869783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.