ArticleScientific reports2024
Non-linear relationship between pulse pressure and the risk of prediabetes: a 5-year cohort study in Chinese adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocannabinoid and AGE Interactions in Prediabetes: The Role of Mediterranean Diet Adherence.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Interaction between sex and one-hour post-load glucose on metabolic syndrome and its components among Chinese people at high risk of diabetes.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2024Article
- Examination of nonlinear associations between pulse pressure index and incident prediabetes susceptibility: a 5-year retrospective cohort investigation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has established a strong link between pulse pressure (PP) and diabetes, but there is limited investigation into the connection between PP and prediabetes. This study aims to explore the potential association between PP and prediabetes. A retrospective cohort study encompassed 202,320 Chinese adults who underwent health check-ups between 2010 and 2016. Prediabetes was defined in accordance with the World Health Organization criteria, indicating impaired fasting glucose, with fasting blood glucose levels ranging from 6.1 to 6.9 mmol/L. To assess the PP-prediabetes relationship, we employed Cox regression analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression, coupled with cubic spline functions and smooth curve fitting, helped elucidate the non-linear PP-prediabetes relationship. Upon adjusting for confounding factors, we observed a positive association between PP and prediabetes (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11-1.18, P < 0.0001). Participants in the fourth quartile (PP ≥ 51 mmHg) had a 73% higher likelihood of developing prediabetes compared to those in the first quartile (PP < 36 mmHg) (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.52-1.97, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the relationship between PP and prediabetes was non-linear. A two-piece Cox proportional hazards regression model identified an inflection point at 40 mmHg for PP (P for log-likelihood ratio test = 0.047). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses corroborated the robustness of our findings. Our study reveals a non-linear correlation between PP and prediabetes, signifying an increased risk of prediabetes when PP levels exceed 40 mmHg. This discovery has significant clinical implications for early prediabetes prevention and intervention, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.