Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38360431›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2024

How does evolution work in superabundant microbes?

Dmitry A Filatov, Mark Kirkpatrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Profile of Mark Kirkpatrick.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dmitry A FilatovDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. Electronic address: dmitry.filatov@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Mark KirkpatrickDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Funding

Genomic causes and consequences of sexually antagonistic selectionR01GM116853 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI KIRKPATRICK, MARK · 2015 to 2022
$3.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P009808/1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine phytoplankton play crucial roles in the Earth's ecological, chemical, and geological processes. They are responsible for about half of global primary production and drive the ocean biological carbon pump. Understanding how plankton species may adapt to the Earth's rapidly changing environments is evidently an urgent priority. This problem requires evolutionary genetic approaches as evolution occurs at the level of allele frequency change within populations driven by genetic drift and natural selection (microevolution). Plankters such as the coccolithophore Gephyrocapsa huxleyi and the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus 'marinus' are among Earth's most abundant organisms. In this opinion paper we discuss how evolution in astronomically large populations of superabundant microbes (SAMs) may act fundamentally differently than it does in the populations of more modest size found in well-studied organisms. This offers exciting opportunities to study evolution in the conditions that have yet to be explored and also leads to unique challenges. Exploring these opportunities and challenges is the goal of this article.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhytoplanktonEvolution, MolecularGene FrequencyGenetic DriftProchlorococcusSelection, Geneticevolutionevolutionary genetic methodsgenetic diversitymarine planktonpopulation sizesuperabundant microbes

Identifiers

PMID38360431
PMCPMC7618509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.