Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38360160›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2024

Investigating the "sex paradox" in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Results from the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR).

Jacqueline T DesJardin, Noah Kime, Nicholas A Kolaitis, Richard A Kronmal, Matthew R Lammi, Stephen C Mathai, Corey E Ventetuolo, Teresa De Marco, PHAR Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline T DesJardinDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: Jacqueline.desjardin@ucsf.edu.
Noah KimeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Nicholas A KolaitisDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Richard A KronmalDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Matthew R LammiComprehensive Pulmonary Hypertension Center - University Medical Center, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Stephen C MathaiDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Corey E VentetuoloDepartment of Medicine and Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Teresa De MarcoDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
PHAR Investigators
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington · USJohns Hopkins University · USLouisiana State University · USRhode Island Department of Health · US

Funding

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BASIS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASET32HL007731 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Brian L Black · 1992 to 2026
$12.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemale sex is a significant risk factor for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), yet males with PAH have worse survival - a phenomenon referred to as the "sex paradox" in PAH.

methodsAll adult PAH patients in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry (PHAR) with congruent sex and gender were included. Baseline differences in demographics, hemodynamics, functional parameters, and quality of life were assessed by sex. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate survival by sex. Mediation analysis was conducted with Cox proportional hazards regression by comparing the unadjusted hazard ratios for sex before and after adjustment for covariates. The plausibility of collider-stratification bias was assessed by modeling how large an unmeasured factor would have to be to generate the observed sex-based mortality differences. Subgroup analysis was performed on idiopathic and incident patients.

resultsAmong the 1,891 patients included, 75% were female. Compared to men, women had less favorable hemodynamics, lower 6-minute walk distance, more PAH therapies, and worse functional class; however, sex-based differences were less pronounced when accounting for body surface area or expected variability by gender. On multivariate analysis, women had a 48% lower risk of death compared to men (Hazard Ratio 0.52, 95% Confidence interval 0.36 - 0.74, p < 0.001). Modeling found that under reasonable assumptions collider-stratification could account for sex-based differences in mortality.

conclusionsIn this large registry of PAH patients new to a care center, men had worse survival than women despite having more favorable baseline characteristics. Collider-stratification bias could account for the observed greater mortality among men.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Arterial HypertensionQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSex FactorsSurvival RateUnited Statesepidemiologyhemodynamicsmortalitypulmonary arterial hypertensionsex

Identifiers

PMID38360160
PMCPMC11500812
OpenAlexW4391788245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.