Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38359933›Full record

SynthesisJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN

Pharmacological adjuncts and transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced synaptic plasticity: a systematic review.

Myren N Sohn, Joshua C Brown, Prayushi Sharma, Ulf Ziemann, Alexander McGirr

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Myren N SohnFrom the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann).
Joshua C BrownFrom the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann).
Prayushi SharmaFrom the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann).
Ulf ZiemannFrom the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann).
Alexander McGirrFrom the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Alta., Canada (Sohn, McGirr); the McLean Hospital, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Belmont, Mass., USA (Brown, Sharma); the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA (Brown); the Department of Neurology & Stroke, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann); and the Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany (Ziemann) alexander.mcgirr@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive neurostimulation modality that has been used to study human synaptic plasticity. Leveraging work in ex vivo preparations, mechanistically informed pharmacological adjuncts to TMS have been used to improve our fundamental understanding of TMS-induced synaptic plasticity.

methodsWe systematically reviewed the literature pairing pharmacological adjuncts with TMS plasticity-induction protocols in humans. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase from 2013 to Mar. 10, 2023. Studies published before 2013 were extracted from a previous systematic review. We included studies using repetitive TMS, theta-burst stimulation, paired associative stimulation, and quadripulse stimulation paradigms in healthy and clinical populations.

resultsThirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria (28 in healthy and 8 in clinical populations). Most pharmacological agents have targeted the glutamatergic LIMITATIONS: This review is limited by the predominance in the literature of studies with small sample sizes and crossover designs.

conclusionPharmacologically enhanced TMS largely parallels findings from ex vivo preparations. As this area expands and novel targets are tested, adequately powered samples in healthy and clinical populations will inform the mechanisms of TMS-induced plasticity in health and disease.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationHumansReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID38359933
PMCPMC10890793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.