ArticleHealthcare informatics research2024
Survey of Medical Applications of Federated Learning.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Wearable Sensors for Advanced Health Monitoring and Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Navigating real-world challenges: A case study on federated learning in computational pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing healthcare data analytics with federated learning: A comprehensive survey of applications, systems, and future directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMedical artificial intelligence (AI) has recently attracted considerable attention. However, training medical AI models is challenging due to privacy-protection regulations. Among the proposed solutions, federated learning (FL) stands out. FL involves transmitting only model parameters without sharing the original data, making it particularly suitable for the medical field, where data privacy is paramount. This study reviews the application of FL in the medical domain.
methodsWe conducted a literature search using the keywords "federated learning" in combination with "medical," "healthcare," or "clinical" on Google Scholar and PubMed. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 58 papers were selected for analysis. These FL studies were categorized based on the types of data used, the target disease, the use of open datasets, the local model of FL, and the neural network model. We also examined issues related to heterogeneity and security.
resultsIn the investigated FL studies, the most commonly used data type was image data, and the most studied target diseases were cancer and COVID-19. The majority of studies utilized open datasets. Furthermore, 72% of the FL articles addressed heterogeneity issues, while 50% discussed security concerns.
conclusionsFL in the medical domain appears to be in its early stages, with most research using open data and focusing on specific data types and diseases for performance verification purposes. Nonetheless, medical FL research is anticipated to be increasingly applied and to become a vital component of multi-institutional research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.