Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38359527›Full record

ReviewPediatric neurology2024

The Tangential Dialogue Between Science and Medicine: A Case in Point.

Nina F Schor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nina F SchorOffice of the Director, Division of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: nina.schor@nih.gov.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 OD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The road between a hypothesis about a disease or condition and its cure or palliation is never simply linear. There are many tantalizing tangents to be chased and many seemingly obvious truths with countless exceptions; this is usually a feature, not a bug, as they say in computer programming. In the tangents and exceptions are clues and alternative roads to science and medicine that can provide cures and palliative measures, sometimes for diseases or conditions other than the one being studied. The narrative that follows uses the author's scientific experience in childhood nervous system cancer to illustrate the importance of a robust, bidirectional interaction between the laboratory bench and the clinic bedside in the quest for solutions to problems of health, longevity, and quality of life.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeHumansChemotherapyNeuroblastomaNeurotrophinsProtein methylationReactive oxygen speciesTranscription factorsTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID38359527
PMCPMC10940191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.