ArticlePloS one2024
Go with the flow: Impacts of high and low flow conditions on freshwater mussel assemblages and distribution.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the drivers of distribution and assemblage composition of aquatic organisms is an important aspect of management and conservation, especially in freshwater systems that are inordinately facing increasing anthropogenic pressures and decreasing biodiversity. For stream organisms, habitat conditions during high flows may be impossible to measure in the field, but can be an important factor for their distribution, especially for less mobile organisms like freshwater mussels. Hence, the objective of this study was to use a two dimensional HEC-RAS model to simulate hydraulic conditions during high and baseline flows (flows approx. 10-600 x and 0.7 x median daily flows respectively) in a 20 km segment in the San Saba River, Texas in combination with existing mussel survey data from 200 sites (collected every 100m) to 1) examine whether hydraulic conditions differed between areas of increased mussel richness and diversity (referred to as hotspots) and other sites, and 2) understand how well site occupancy and species abundance could be explained by hydraulic conditions occurring under different flow conditions. The results showed that richness and diversity hotspots occurred in deeper areas with lower shear stress, stream power, and Froude number during both high and low flows. Occupancy could be predicted with 67-79% accuracy at the site scale and 60-70% accuracy at the mesohabitat scale (∼20 to 1200 m long). In addition, hydraulic conditions across flow scenarios explained up to 55% of variation in species abundances, but predictions were less successful for species often observed to occupy micro-scale flow refuges such as bedrock crevices. The results indicate that pools may serve as important refuge for all species during both high and low flow events, which may be relatively unique to bedrock-dominated systems. Understanding hydraulic conditions that occur at extreme flows such as these is important given that the frequency and magnitude of such events are increasing due to climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.