Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Challenges of proper disposal of old long-lasting insecticidal nets and its alternative uses in rural south-eastern Tanzania.

Sheila J Msangi, Winifrida P Mponzi, Letus L Muyaga, Joel D Nkya, Yohana A Mwalugelo, Hajirani M Msuya, Dickson W Lwetoijera, Emmanuel W Kaindoa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Sheila J MsangiEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-6161-2129
Winifrida P MponziEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Letus L MuyagaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Joel D NkyaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Yohana A MwalugeloEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Hajirani M MsuyaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Dickson W LwetoijeraEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Emmanuel W KaindoaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZ

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInsecticide-treated nets (ITNs), specifically long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), are the most commonly used, scalable, and cost-effective tools for controlling malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. However, the multiple alternative uses of retired LLINs have been associated with poor disposal practices. The World Health Organization (WHO) has provided guidelines and recommendations for the proper management of worn-out LLINs. This study assessed the existing alternative uses and disposal practices of old LLINs.

methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used to assess LLINs existing alternative uses, disposal practices, knowledge, and perceptions regarding WHO recommendations on proper disposal of old LLINs among stakeholders in Kilombero and Ulanga districts, south-eastern Tanzania. A survey questionnaire was administered to 384 participants. Furthermore, the study employed focus group discussions (FGD) and key informant interviews (KII) to elucidate responses regarding existing disposal practices, associated challenges, and alternative uses of LLINs. The insights derived from both study components were subsequently used for inferential analysis.

resultsThe major challenge influencing the proper disposal of LLINs was limited awareness of how to properly dispose of them. Of the 384 people surveyed, 97.0% were not aware of the WHO recommendations for the proper disposal of old LLINs. All key informants were unaware of the WHO guidelines for proper disposal of old LLINs. The common methods used to dispose of LLINs were burning (30.7%), disposing them into garbage pits (14.8%), and alternative uses (12.2%). Of the 239 respondents with LLINs, 41.0% had alternative use, while 59.0% had no alternative use. The common alternative uses were ropes for tying or covering items (20.9%), garden fencing (7.5%), chicken coops (5.0%), and 7.5% for other minor alternative uses.

conclusionStrengthening awareness and education on proper LLIN disposal practices among community members and key stakeholders is essential for enhancing malaria control efforts and preventing environmental pollution.

Indexed as

InsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaHumansMosquito ControlTanzaniaInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID38358973
PMCPMC10868818
OpenAlexW4391839473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.