ArticleAging2024
Comprehensive analysis of disulfidptosis-related genes: a prognosis model construction and tumor microenvironment characterization in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisulfidptosis, a form of cell death induced by abnormal intracellular accumulation of disulfides, is a newly recognized variety of cell death. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a usual urological tumor that poses serious health risks. There are few studies of disulfidptosis-related genes (DRGs) in ccRCC so far.
methodsThe expression, transcriptional variants, and prognostic role of DRGs were assessed. Based on DRGs, consensus unsupervised clustering analysis was performed to stratify ccRCC patients into various subtypes and constructed a DRG risk scoring model. Patients were stratified into high or low-risk groups by this model. We focused on assessing the discrepancy in prognosis, TME, chemotherapeutic susceptibility, and landscape of immune between the two risk groups. Finally, we validated the expression and explored the biological function of the risk scoring gene FLRT3 through
resultsThe different subtypes had significantly different gene expression, immune, and prognostic landscapes. In the two risk groups, the high-risk group had higher TME scores, more significant immune cell infiltration, and a higher probability of benefiting from immunotherapy, but had a worse prognosis. There were also remarkable differences in chemotherapeutic susceptibility between the two risk groups. In ccRCC cells, the expression of FLRT3 was shown to be lower and its overexpression caused a decrease in cell proliferation and metastatic capacity.
conclusionsStarting from disulfidptosis, we established a new risk scoring model which can provide new ideas for doctors to forecast patient survival and determine clinical treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.