Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358742›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Primary Treatment Modification and Treatment Tolerability Among Older Chemotherapy Recipients With Advanced Cancer.

Mostafa R Mohamed, David Q Rich, Christopher Seplaki, Jennifer L Lund, Marie Flannery, Eva Culakova, Allison Magnuson, Megan Wells, Rachael Tylock, Supriya G Mohile

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Frailty in oncogeriatrics].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tailoring Therapy in Older Adults With Hematologic Malignancies.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mostafa R MohamedDivision of Hematology/Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
David Q RichDepartment of Public Health, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Christopher SeplakiDepartment of Public Health, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Jennifer L LundDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Marie FlanneryUniversity of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, New York.
Eva CulakovaDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Allison MagnusonDivision of Hematology/Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Megan WellsDivision of Hematology/Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Rachael TylockDivision of Hematology/Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Supriya G MohileDivision of Hematology/Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
University of Rochester · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI B Paige Lawrence · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
Geriatric Oncology Research Infrastructure to Improve Clinical CareR33AG059206 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI WILLIAM DALE, Heidi Diana Klepin · 2020 to 2026
$5.1M
Understanding Treatment Tolerability in Older Patients with CancerU01CA233167 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2018 to 2023
$3.5M
Reducing Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older AdultsR01CA177592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2013 to 2018
$3.0M
A Patient-Oriented Research Program in Geriatric OncologyK24AG056589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Supriya G. Mohile · 2018 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177592NCI NIH HHS U01 CA233167NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056589NIA NIH HHS R33 AG059206NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older adults with advanced cancer are less likely to tolerate treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy compared with younger patients due to their aging-related conditions. Hence, oncologists sometimes opt to employ primary treatment modifications (deviation from standard of care) during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Objective: To examine the association between primary treatment modification and treatment tolerability in older adults with advanced cancer who were starting new palliative chemotherapy regimens. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was a secondary analysis of the GAP70+ (Geriatric Assessment Intervention for Reducing Toxicity in Older Patients with Advanced Cancer) trial, which was conducted between July 2014 and March 2019. The GAP70+ trial included patients aged 70 years or older who had advanced (ie, incurable) cancer, had 1 or more geriatric assessment domain impairments, and planned to start a new palliative chemotherapy regimen. Data analysis was conducted in November 2022. Exposures: Receipt of standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens vs primary treatment modification defined as any change from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines or published clinical trials (eg, primary dose reduction, schedule change). Main Outcomes and Measures: Tolerability outcomes were assessed within 3 months of treatment. These outcomes included the following: (1) any grade 3 to 5 toxic effect, according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; (2) patient-reported functional decline, defined as the development of worse dependency in activities of daily living using scale scores; and (3) a composite adverse outcome (an end point that combined toxic effects, functional decline, and 6-month overall survival). Multivariable cluster-weighted generalized estimating equation models examined the association between primary treatment modification and outcomes adjusting for covariates. Results: This study included 609 patients with a mean (SD) age of 77.2 (5.2) years; more than half (333 [54.7%]) were men. Race and ethnicity was available for 607 patients: 39 (6.4%) were Black, 539 (88.5%) were non-Hispanic White, and 29 (4.8%) were of other race or ethnicity. Nearly half (281 [46.1%]) received a primary modified treatment regimen. The most common cancer types were gastrointestinal cancer (228 [37.4%]) and lung cancer (174 [28.6%]). In multivariable analysis, primary treatment modification was associated with a reduced risk of grade 3 to 5 toxic effects (relative risk [RR], 0.85 [95% CI, 0.77-0.94]) and functional decline (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]). Patients who received primary treatment modification had 32.0% lower odds of having a worse composite adverse outcome (odds ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.48-0.97]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, primary treatment modification was associated with improved tolerability of chemotherapeutic regimens among older adults with advanced cancer and aging-related conditions. These findings may help optimize cancer treatment dosing in older adults with advanced cancer and aging-related conditions.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingLung NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesData AnalysisDrug TaperingFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID38358742
PMCPMC10870189
OpenAlexW4391847382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.