Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358617›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2024

Applications of Ultraviolet and Sub-ultraviolet Dermatoscopy in Neoplastic and Non-neoplastic Dermatoses: A Systematic Review.

Paweł Pietkiewicz, Cristian Navarrete-Dechent, Yaei Togawa, Piotr Szlązak, Natalia Salwowska, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Agnieszka Leszczyńska-Pietkiewicz, Enzo Errichetti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sub-ultraviolet reflectance dermoscopy in longitudinal melanonychia.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Dermoscopy: Game Changers.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Paweł PietkiewiczZwierzyniecka Medical Center, Zwierzyniecka 30/28, 60-814, Poznań, Poland. pietkiewicz.pp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7262-2456
Cristian Navarrete-DechentMelanoma and Skin Cancer Unit, Department of Dermatology, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Yaei TogawaDepartment of Dermatology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Piotr SzlązakPolish Dermatoscopy Group, Poznań, Poland.
Natalia SalwowskaPolish Dermatoscopy Group, Poznań, Poland.
Ashfaq A MarghoobDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Agnieszka Leszczyńska-PietkiewiczPolish Dermatoscopy Group, Poznań, Poland.
Enzo ErrichettiInstitute of Dermatology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLChiba University · JPGdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Silesia · PLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermatoscopy is a non-invasive and cost-efficient imaging technique augmenting clinical examination in neoplastic and non-neoplastic dermatoses. Recently, novel dermatoscopic techniques based on principles of reflectance/absorption and excited fluorescence have been developed. However, comprehensive data on their applications are sparse, and terminology is inconsistent. In this systematic review, we addressed the principles of ultraviolet (UV) imaging and proposed categorization based on spectral characteristics and signal acquisition, as well as discussed documented and potential clinical applications, safety measures during examination, and limitations associated with reflectance and fluorescence dermatoscopy. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed medical database until 2 December 2023 according to PRISMA guidelines, and 28 papers fit the scope of this review, whereas additional relevant articles were included to provide broader context regarding the chosen terminology, chromophores described, safety of sub-UV/UV, and regulations for light-emitting devices. UV and sub-UV dermatoscopy, categorized into different methods on the basis of the emitted wavelength and signal acquisition process (reflectance versus fluorescence), augment conventional dermatoscopy by optimizing safety margins in melanoma, facilitating early detection of tumor recurrence, and enhancing visualization in non-neoplastic conditions, including pigmentation disorders, intertrigo, papulo-desquamative dermatoses, and beyond. The review highlights the limitations of these techniques, including difficulty in differentiating melanin from hemoglobin, challenges in evaluating uneven surfaces, and artifacts. Although UV dermatoscopy complements conventional dermatoscopy, clinicians should be aware of their peculiarities, artifacts, limitations, and safety concerns to optimize their diagnostic accuracy and ensure patient's safety.

Indexed as

AbsorptionDermatoscopyEntomodermatoscopyImagingInfectoscopyReflectanceSkin cancerSkin diseasesUltraviolet radiation

Identifiers

PMID38358617
PMCPMC10890990
OpenAlexW4391840252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.