ArticleAdvances in therapy2024
Application of Northern Goshawk Back-Propagation Artificial Neural Network in the Prediction of Monohydroxycarbazepine Concentration in Patients with Epilepsy.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA northern goshawk back-propagation artificial neural network (NGO-BPANN) model was established to predict monohydroxycarbazepine (MHD) concentration in patients with epilepsy.
methodsThe data were collected from 108 Han Chinese patients with epilepsy on oxcarbazepine monotherapy. The results of 14 genotype variates were selected as the input layer in the first BPANN model, and the variables that had a more significant impact on the plasma concentration of MHD were retained. With demographic characteristics and clinical laboratory test results, the genotypes of SCN1A rs2298771 and SCN2A rs17183814 were used to construct the BPANN model. The BPANN model was comprehensively validated and used to predict the MHD plasma concentration of five patients with epilepsy in our hospital.
resultsThe model demonstrated favorable fitness metrics, including a mean squared error of 0.00662, a gradient magnitude of 0.00753, an absence of validation tests amounting to zero, and a correlation coefficient of 0.980. Sex, BMI, and the genotype SCN1A rs2298771 were ranked highest by the absolute mean impact value (MIV), which is primarily associated with the concentration of MHD. The test group exhibited a range of - 20.84% to 31.03% bias between the predicted and measured values, with a correlation coefficient of 0.941 between the two. With BPANN, the MHD nadir concentration could be predicted precisely.
conclusionThe NGO-BPANN model exhibits exceptional predictive capability and can be a practical instrument for forecasting MHD concentration in patients with epilepsy. CLINICAL
trial registrationwww.chiCTR-OOC-17012141 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.