Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358521›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Salvage vesiculectomy for local prostate cancer recurrence: surgical technique and early post-operative outcomes.

Alexander Giesen, Thomas Van den Broeck, Dries Develtere, Yannic Raskin, Kevin Wymer, Christopher Eden, Marc Claessens, Robert Hente, Kato Rans, Charlien Berghen and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Alexander Giesen *Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas Van den Broeck *Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Dries DeveltereDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Yannic RaskinDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Kevin WymerDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Christopher EdenDepartment of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
Marc ClaessensDepartment of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.
Robert HenteDepartment of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.
Kato RansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Charlien BerghenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gert De MeerleerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stephen LangleyDepartment of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
David Pfister *Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Steven Joniau *Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. steven.joniau@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-9890
KU Leuven · BEAZ Klina · BEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIsolated recurrence in remnants of the seminal vesicles (SV) after treatment of primary prostate cancer (PCa) has become a more frequent entity with the widespread use of more sensitive next-generation imaging modalities. Salvage vesiculectomy is hypothesized to be a worthwhile management option in these patients. The primary goal of this study is to describe the surgical technique of this new treatment option. Secondary outcomes are peri- and post-operative complications and early oncological outcomes.

methodsRetrospective multicenter study, including 108 patients with solitary recurrence in the SV treated between January 2009 and June 2022, was performed. Patients with local recurrences outside the SVs or with metastatic disease were excluded. Both SVs were resected using a robot-assisted or an open approach. In selected cases, a concomitant lymphadenectomy was performed.

resultsOverall, 31 patients (29%) reported complications, all but one grade 1 to 3 on the Clavien-Dindo Scale. A median PSA decrease of 2.07 ng/ml (IQR: 0.80-4.33, p < 0.001), translating into a median PSA reduction of 92% (IQR: 59-98%) was observed. At a median follow-up of 14 months, freedom from secondary treatment was 54%. Lymphadenectomy had a significant influence on PSA reduction (p = 0.018).

conclusionSalvage vesiculectomy for PCa recurrence limited to the SV is a safe procedure with excellent PSA response and is a potential curative treatment in a subset of patients. A concomitant lymphadenectomy can best be performed in all patients that did not underwent one at primary treatment.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMalePelvisProstateSeminal VesiclesProstate-Specific AntigenProstate cancerSalvage treatmentSurgeryVesiculectomy

Identifiers

PMID38358521
OpenAlexW4391840630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.