Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358519›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2024

The use of animal models in preclinical investigations for the development of a surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Amelia Seifalian, Alex Digesu, Vikram Khullar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ComparativeBiomacromolecules · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amelia SeifalianDepartment of Urogynaecology, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.seifalian@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5794-6900
Alex DigesuDepartment of Urogynaecology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vikram KhullarDepartment of Urogynaecology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPolypropylene (PP) mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has raised substantial concerns over long-term complications, leading to its ban in multiple countries. In response, emerging materials are being explored as alternatives for prolapse surgery. Preclinical animal models have historically played a pivotal role in validating medical devices, prior to clinical trials. Successful translation of these materials necessitates the identification of suitable animal models that replicate the female human pelvis and its biomechanical properties. Preclinical in vivo testing assesses the safety of surgical mesh and treatment efficacy in preventing POP recurrence.

methodsThe research critically reviews animal models used for preclinical pelvic mesh testing over the last decade and proposes a promising model for future preclinical studies.

resultsRats were the most common mammal used for toxicity and biocompatibility investigations through abdominal implantation. Although non-human primates serve as a gold standard for efficacy testing, ethical considerations limit their use owing to their close biological and cognitive resemblance to humans. Consequently, sheep were the most preferred large animal model owing to their reproductive system similarities and propensity for spontaneous POP following parity.

conclusionThe study contributes valuable insights into the selection of appropriate animal models for preclinical pelvic mesh testing, offering guidance that is crucial for enhancing the safety and efficacy of novel surgical interventions in the treatment of POP.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalPelvic Organ ProlapseSurgical MeshAnimalsFemaleHumansMaterials TestingModels, AnimalRatsSheepAnimal modelBiomaterialsGraphenePelvic meshPolypropylenePreclinical trials

Identifiers

PMID38358519
PMCPMC11052796
OpenAlexW4391840434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.