ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
A nomogram of preoperative indicators predicting lymph vascular space invasion in cervical cancer.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peritumoral ultrasound-driven multimodal AI model for predicting lymphovascular space invasion and prognosis in cervical cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Predicting the biological behavior of cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a machine learning approach using apparent transverse relaxation rate (R2* maps) radiomics nomogram.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Nomogram prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion in cervical cancer: comparison of 2009 and 2018 staging systems.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model for Individualized Prediction of Cervical Cancer Risk: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop predictive nomograms of lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
methodsWe identified 403 patients with cervical cancer from the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients were divided into the training set (n = 242) and the validation set (n = 161), with patients in the training set subdivided into LVSI (+) and LVSI (-) groups according to postoperative pathology. Preoperative hematologic indexes were compared between the two subgroups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the independent risk factors for LVSI, from which a nomogram was constructed using the R package.
resultsLVSI (+) was present in 94 out of 242 patients in the training set, accompanied by a significant increase in the preoperative squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), white blood cells (WBC), neutrophil (NE), platelet (PLT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and tumor size (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that SCC, WBC, NE, NLR, PLR, SII, and tumor size were correlated with LVSI (P < 0.05), and multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, SCC, WBC, and NLR were independent risk factors for LVSI (P < 0.05). A nomogram was correspondingly established with good performance in predicting LVSI [training: ROC-AUC = 0.845 (95% CI: 0.731-0.843) and external validation: ROC-AUC = 0.704 (95% CI: 0.683-0.835)] and high accuracy (training: C-index = 0.787; external validation: C-index = 0.759).
conclusionThe nomogram based on preoperative tumor size, SCC, WBC, and NLR had excellent accuracy and discriminative capability to assess the risk of LVSI in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.