Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358433›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024

Significance of serum AMH and antral follicle count discrepancy for the prediction of ovarian stimulation response in Poseidon criteria patients.

Alyssa Hochberg, Michael H Dahan, Hakan Yarali, Lan N Vuong, Sandro C Esteves

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Regulation of Curcumin on Follicle Initiation Rate in Diminished Ovarian Reserve.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Alyssa HochbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 845 Rue Sherbrooke, O, Montreal, QC, 3HA 0G4, Canada. alyssahoch@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-409X
Michael H DahanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, 845 Rue Sherbrooke, O, Montreal, QC, 3HA 0G4, Canada.
Hakan YaraliAnatolia IVF, Ankara, Turkey.
Lan N VuongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Sandro C EstevesANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil.
Hacettepe University · TRMcGill University · CATel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the risk of not being a poor responder in ovarian stimulation (OS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) when ovarian reserve markers are discordant-one falling within Poseidon's criteria normal range (e.g., anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≥ 1.2 ng/mL or antral follicle count (AFC) ≥ 5), and the other in the poor ovarian reserve range.

methodsA tri-center retrospective cohort study (2015-2017) involving women with discordant AMH and AFC values undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle using conventional OS (cOS, ≥ 150 IU/day of follicle-stimulating hormone). Discordant serum AMH and AFC values were defined according to Poseidon's criteria (AMH < 1.2 ng/mL and AFC ≥ 5 or AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL and AFC < 5). Poor ovarian response (POR) was < 4 retrieved oocytes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine AMH and AFC cut-offs for non-POR. Logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with non-POR.

resultsOut of 8797 patients who underwent assessment with both AMH and AFC, 1172 (13.3%) exhibited discordant values. Of these, 854 (72.9%) had ≥ 4 oocytes retrieved. Within this group, 726 (85.0%) had "low" AMH values, whereas 128 (15.0%) had "low" AFCs. An AFC of 6 had 77% sensitivity and 52% specificity (AUC = 0.700), while AMH of 1.19 ng/mL had 31% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.492) for non-POR. AFC and the use of recombinant gonadotropins were positive predictors of non-POR.

conclusionsWhen serum AMH is < 1.19 ng/mL, but AFC is ≥ 6, there is a moderate likelihood of a non-POR during stimulation. Conversely, if AFC is < 5 but serum AMH is ≥ 1.19 ng/mL, the chances of non-POR are low. Among patients with discordant markers, AFC emerges as the primary predictor of oocyte yield.

Indexed as

Ovarian FollicleOvarian ReserveAnti-Mullerian HormoneFemaleFertilization in VitroFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansOvulation InductionRetrospective StudiesAnti-Mullerian HormoneFollicle Stimulating HormoneAnti-Müllerian hormoneAntral follicle countDiscordancyOvarian stimulationPoor ovarian responsePoseidon criteria

Identifiers

PMID38358433
PMCPMC10957796
OpenAlexW4391841306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.