ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024
Value of combined serum CEA, CA72-4, and CA19-9 marker detection in diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative tumor marker burden score predicts survival in colorectal cancer according to tumor size.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic value of fecal and serum carcinoembryonic antigen for colorectal cancer detection.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram for Diagnosing Colorectal Cancer Based on Immune-Nutritional Score.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A predictive model for metastatic colorectal cancer based on immune cells and tumor markers.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Combination of fecal SDC2 methylation with serum CEA/CA72-4 in screening of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Research advances in early screening for colorectal cancer (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- An interpretable machine learning model combining MRI-DKI habitat radiomic features and clinical biomarkers for noninvasive prediction of lymphatic metastasis in rectal cancer: a prospective study.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Beyond Structure: The Dynamic Role of the Extracellular Matrix Components in Immune Evasion.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Performance of Circulating miRNA-92a and Related Circulating miRNA Panels for Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the diagnostic value of combined gastrointestinal endoscopy and serum CEA and CA19-9 levels in gastrointestinal tumor.Medicine · 2025Article
- Screening of glycan biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer based on novel isotope labeling relative quantitative method.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Article
- High-Performance Silicon Nanowire Array Biosensor for Combined Detection of Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers.Micromachines · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Oncological Biomarker Framework Guiding Precision Medicine.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of a Four-miRNA Signature in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Metabolic parameters in F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for treatment response in colorectal carcinoma.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Value of the Combined Detection of Microbiota, Multiple Inflammation-Related Indicators, Serum Lipid Indices, and Tumour Markers in Colorectal Polyps: A Case-Control Study.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Rapid detection of liver metastasis risk in colorectal cancer patients through blood test indicators.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to examine whether the combination of serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], carbohydrate antigen [CA]72-4, CA19-9) improves sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesion tubular adenoma.
methodsAn automatic electrochemiluminescence immunoassay with matched kits (ECLIA) was performed on a Roche Cobas e411 analyzer to determine the levels of serum CEA, CA72-4, and CA19-9 in 35 patients with early colorectal cancer, 87 patients with tubular adenoma, and 58 healthy people undergoing colonoscopy after positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in a colorectal cancer screening program 2021 January to April. The values of these three tumor markers in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and tubular adenoma were analyzed.
results180 patients (92 female and 88 male) were included into the study. We compared serum CEA, CA72-4 and CA19-9 markers among 3 groups: healthy people (mean age 64,0 ±8,6), patients with tubular adenoma (mean age 62,7 ± 6,4) and colorectal cancer (mean age 59,2 ±6,2). The levels of serum CEA, CA72-4, and CA19-9 were higher in the colorectal cancer group than in the tubular adenoma group and healthy subjects, and these differences were significant (p < 0.05). The combination of CEA, CA72-4, and CA19-9 had a higher diagnostic value for colorectal cancer compared to single markers, and the positive detection rate was 54.3%. The diagnostic power when using all three markers was the best, and applied for colorectal cancer and tubular adenoma.
conclusionsThe combination of CA72-4, CEA, and CA19-9 markers increases the sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and can thus be considered an important tool for early colorectal diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.