Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358401›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2024

Interfacial Tissue Regeneration with Bone.

Stephanie S Steltzer, Adam C Abraham, Megan L Killian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie S SteltzerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Adam C AbrahamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Megan L KillianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. mlkillia@med.umich.edu.

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID P OLSON · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
FGF signaling during growth and mechanical adaptation of tendon-bone interfacesR01AR079367 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KILLIAN, MEGAN L. · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Stratified and mechanically-tough biomaterial implant to improve tendon-to-bone enthesis regenerationR01AR077858 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HARLEY, BRENDAN A. · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077858NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079367NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIH HHS R01AR077858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewInterfacial tissue exists throughout the body at cartilage-to-bone (osteochondral interface) and tendon-to-bone (enthesis) interfaces. Healing of interfacial tissues is a current challenge in regenerative approaches because the interface plays a critical role in stabilizing and distributing the mechanical stress between soft tissues (e.g., cartilage and tendon) and bone. The purpose of this review is to identify new directions in the field of interfacial tissue development and physiology that can guide future regenerative strategies for improving post-injury healing. RECENT

findingsCues from interfacial tissue development may guide regeneration including biological cues such as cell phenotype and growth factor signaling; structural cues such as extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, ECM, and cell alignment; and mechanical cues such as compression, tension, shear, and the stiffness of the cellular microenvironment. In this review, we explore new discoveries in the field of interfacial biology related to ECM remodeling, cellular metabolism, and fate. Based on emergent findings across multiple disciplines, we lay out a framework for future innovations in the design of engineered strategies for interface regeneration. Many of the key mechanisms essential for interfacial tissue development and adaptation have high potential for improving outcomes in the clinic.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationExtracellular MatrixBone and BonesCartilageHumansRegenerationTendonsTissue EngineeringWound HealingCellular microenvironmentEnthesisExtracellular matrixMechanical loadingOsteochondral interface

Identifiers

PMID38358401
PMCPMC11060924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.