ArticleNoise & health
Effects of Comprehensive Noise Reduction Management Combined with Reality Therapy on Anxiety and Depression in Hospitalised Patients with Breast Cancer.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and prediction model for sub-threshold depression in young and middle-aged breast cancer patients.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study was conducted to explore the effects of comprehensive noise reduction management combined with reality therapy on anxiety and depression in hospitalised patients with breast cancer. Methods: The medical records of 166 inpatients with breast cancer in Tongji Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from March 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analysed. According to different intervention methods, these patients were divided into group A (n = 58, receiving conventional intervention), group B (n = 55, receiving conventional intervention combined with reality therapy) and group C (n = 53, receiving conventional intervention combined with comprehensive noise reduction management and reality therapy intervention). Patients' anxiety and depression, quality of life and satisfaction degree in the three groups were compared. Results: Before the intervention, the scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Short-From-36 Health Survey (SF-36) scale did not significantly differ amongst the three groups (P > 0.05). After the intervention, we observed a difference in the pairwise comparison of HADS scores amongst the three groups, in which group C had the lowest score and group A had the highest HADS score (P < 0.001). We also noted a difference in the pairwise comparison of SF-36 scores amongst the three groups, in which group C had the highest SF-36 score and group A had the lowest SF-36 score (P < 0.001). The pairwise comparison of satisfaction revealed a difference amongst the three groups, in which group C had the highest satisfaction (92.45%, 94.34% and 94.34%), and group A had the lowest satisfaction (74.14%, 74.14% and 75.86%; P < 0.05). Conclusion: Comprehensive noise reduction management combined with reality therapy can effectively relieve the negative emotions of inpatients with breast cancer, as well as improve their survival state of patients. It is suggested that it be included in the clinical intervention system for breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.