Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358140›Full record

ArticleAnnals of African medicine

Change in Prevalence and Pattern of Peptic Ulcer Disease in the Northern Savannah of Nigeria: An Endoscopic Study.

Husain Yahya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of African medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Husain YahyaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Kaduna State University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is common worldwide. Its incidence and prevalence have been declining in recent years in developed countries, and a similar trend has been observed in many parts of Africa including Nigeria. Aim: This study aimed to provide an endoscopic update on PUD in the Northern Savannah of Nigeria and compare with past reports from the region and recent reports from Nigeria, Africa, and the rest of the world. Methods: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy records of consecutive patients diagnosed with PUD between January 2014 and September 2022 at an endoscopy unit of a tertiary institution in North-West Nigeria were retrieved and demographic data, types of peptic ulcer, and their characteristics were extracted and analyzed. Results: Over a 9-year period, 171/1958 (8.7%) patients were diagnosed with PUD: mean age 48.8 years (range 14-85), 68.4% male, and 70% >40 years. 59.6% were gastric ulcers (GU), 31.6% duodenal ulcers (DU), and 8.8% were both. The mean age of patients with GU was slightly higher than those with DU (49.9 years vs. 46.6 years, P = 0.29); patients aged <40 years were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with DU than GU (54.7% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.016) while those >40 years significantly more GU than DU (74.6% vs. 54.7%, P = 0.016). There were no significant gender differences between GU and DU. Conclusion: The prevalence and pattern of PUD in Northern Savannah of Nigeria have changed - patients were predominantly male and older, and GU predominated.

Indexed as

Duodenal UlcerPeptic UlcerStomach UlcerAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaPrevalenceYoung AdultDuodenal ulcerepidemiologygastric ulcerKaduna-Nigeriapeptic ulcer disease

Identifiers

PMID38358140
PMCPMC10775940
OpenAlexW4385060952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.