Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38358130›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024

Discovery of broadly-neutralizing antibodies against brown recluse spider and Gadim scorpion sphingomyelinases using consensus toxins as antigens.

Esperanza Rivera-de-Torre, Stefanos Lampadariou, Mark Møiniche, Markus F Bohn, Seyed Mahdi Kazemi, Andreas H Laustsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Towards better antivenoms: navigating the road to new types of snakebite envenoming therapies.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Esperanza Rivera-de-TorreDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0272-6150
Stefanos LampadariouDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Mark MøinicheDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0006-0760-6429
Markus F BohnDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0369-1922
Seyed Mahdi KazemiZagros Herpetological Institute, Qom, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8571-7371
Andreas H LaustsenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6918-5574
Technical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Qom · IR

Funding

European Research Council 850974Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 221702/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broadly-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are becoming increasingly important tools for treating infectious diseases and animal envenomings. However, designing and developing broadly-neutralizing antibodies can be cumbersome using traditional low-throughput iterative protein engineering methods. Here, we present a new high-throughput approach for the standardized discovery of broadly-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies relying on phage display technology and consensus antigens representing average sequences of related proteins. We showcase the utility of this approach by applying it to toxic sphingomyelinases from the venoms of species from very distant orders of the animal kingdom, the recluse spider and Gadim scorpion. First, we designed a consensus sphingomyelinase and performed three rounds of phage display selection, followed by DELFIA-based screening and ranking, and benchmarked this to a similar campaign involving cross-panning against recombinant versions of the native toxins. Second, we identified two scFvs that not only bind the consensus toxins, but which can also neutralize sphingomyelinase activity of native whole venom in vitro. Finally, we conclude that the phage display campaign involving the use of the consensus toxin was more successful in yielding cross-neutralizing scFvs than the phage display campaign involving cross-panning.

Indexed as

Sphingomyelin PhosphodiesteraseSpider VenomsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesBrown Recluse SpiderConsensusScorpionsAntibodies, MonoclonalBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesSphingomyelin PhosphodiesteraseSpider Venomsantivenombroadly-neutralizing antibodiesconsensus antigenconsensus toxinHemiscorpiusLoxoscelesphage displayrecluse spidersphingomyelinasetoxins

Identifiers

PMID38358130
PMCPMC10868436
OpenAlexW4391844144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.