ArticleRenal failure2024
Machine learning algorithm for predict the in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with congestive heart failure combined with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Renal failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the renal-cochlear axis: explainable machine learning and phenotype clustering reveal high-risk hearing loss subtypes in CKD.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Impact of Prior Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Use on Delirium Incidence in ICU Patients: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Five-Year Mortality Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Models: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning framework using visceral adiposity index to predict cardiorenal syndrome: a survey-weighted NHANES study with SHAP interpretation.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Improved CKD classification based on explainable artificial intelligence with extra trees and BBFS.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Personalized prediction for recurrence of cystitis glandularis: insights from SHAP and machine learning models.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Can some algorithms of machine learning identify osteoporosis patients after training and testing some clinical information about patients?BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Association between red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and in-hospital mortality in patients with congestive heart failure combined with chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic, Interpretable, Machine Learning-Based Outcome Prediction as a New Emerging Opportunity in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Stroke research and treatment · 2025Article
- An interpreting machine learning models to predict amputation risk in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a multi-center study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Monitoring of the trough concentration of valproic acid in pediatric epilepsy patients: a machine learning-based ensemble model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for predict in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) combined with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
methodsAfter employing least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression for feature selection, six distinct methodologies were employed in the construction of the model. The selection of the optimal model was based on the area under the curve (AUC). Furthermore, the interpretation of the chosen model was facilitated through the utilization of SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values and the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithm.
resultsThis study collected data and enrolled 5041 patients on CHF combined with CKD from 2008 to 2019, utilizing the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Unit. After selection, 22 of the 47 variables collected post-intensive care unit admission were identified as mortality-associated and subsequently utilized in the development of ML models. Among the six models generated, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated the highest AUC at 0.837. Notably, the SHAP values highlighted the sequential organ failure assessment score, age, simplified acute physiology score II, and urine output as the four most influential variables in the XGBoost model. In addition, the LIME algorithm explains the individualized predictions.
conclusionsIn conclusion, our study accomplished the successful development and validation of ML models for predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with CHF combined with CKD. Notably, the XGBoost model emerged as the most efficacious among all the ML models employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.