Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38357674›Full record

Review3 Biotech2024

Monkeypox virus: insights into pathogenesis and laboratory testing methods.

Anoop Kumar, Neeraj Singh, Anupkumar R Anvikar, Gauri Misra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Therapeutic Innovations for Monkeypox Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anoop Kumar *National Institute of Biologicals, A-32, Sector-62, Institutional Area, Noida, U.P. 201309 India.
Neeraj Singh *National Institute of Biologicals, A-32, Sector-62, Institutional Area, Noida, U.P. 201309 India.
Anupkumar R AnvikarNational Institute of Biologicals, A-32, Sector-62, Institutional Area, Noida, U.P. 201309 India.
Gauri MisraNational Institute of Biologicals, A-32, Sector-62, Institutional Area, Noida, U.P. 201309 India.ORCID 0000-0003-0759-4174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The monkeypox virus (MPXV) is a zoonotic pathogen that transmits between monkeys and humans, exhibiting clinical similarities with the smallpox virus. Studies on the immunopathogenesis of MPXV revealed that an initial strong innate immune response is elicited on viral infection that subsequently helps in circumventing the host defense. Once the World Health Organization (WHO) declared it a global public health emergency in July 2022, it became essential to clearly demarcate the MPXV-induced symptoms from other viral infections. We have exhaustively searched the various databases involving Google Scholar, PubMed, and Medline to extract the information comprehensively compiled in this review. The primary focus of this review is to describe the diagnostic methods for MPXV such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and serological assays, along with developments in viral isolation, imaging techniques, and next-generation sequencing. These innovative technologies have the potential to greatly enhance the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Significant discoveries involving MPXV immunopathogenesis have also been highlighted. Overall, this will be a knowledge repertoire that will be crucial for the development of efficient monitoring and control strategies in response to the MPXV infection helping clinicians and researchers in formulating healthcare strategies.

Indexed as

LAMPMonkeypoxMPXVPathogenesisReal-time PCRZoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID38357674
PMCPMC10861412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.