ArticleOncology letters2024
Inflammation‑based prognostic markers of metastatic pancreatic cancer using real‑world data in Japan: The Tokushukai REAl‑world Data (TREAD) project.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of CONUT and ALBI in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cancer cachexia onset and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: Comparative assessment of the asian working group for cachexia and the European palliative care research collaborative criteria, and utility of modified glasgow prognostic score.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- A novel model for predicting prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients: a retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Inflammation‑based prognostic markers in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer treated with nivolumab: Tokushukai REAl‑world Data project 02 (TREAD 02).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammation-based prognostic markers based on a combination of blood-based parameters, including the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), have been associated with clinical outcomes in patients with various types of cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of these previously reported markers in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. A total of 846 patients were identified between April 2010 and March 2020 as part of a nationwide real-world study from 46 Tokushukai medical group hospitals in Japan. Blood laboratory data collected within 14 days of starting first-line chemotherapy assessed 17 inflammation-based prognostic markers. Information from patients with no missing data was used to compare the accuracy and performance of the inflammation-based prognostic markers. A total of 487 patients were eligible for this supplemental analysis. The 17 inflammation-based markers demonstrated significant prognostic value. Among them, the concordance rate with overall survival (OS) was highest for mGPS. The median OS time of patients with mGPS 0, 1 and 2 was 8.2, 6.0 and 2.9 months, respectively. Compared with mGPS 0, mGPS 1 and 2 showed hazard ratios of 1.39 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.81) and 2.63 (2.00-3.45), respectively. The present real-world data analysis showed that various previously reported inflammation-based markers had significant prognostic value in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Among these markers, the mGPS demonstrated the highest level of accuracy. This trial has been registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000050590 on April 1, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.