Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38357424›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Radiomic model based on magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Yimiao Yu, Zhibo Wang, Qi Wang, Xiaohui Su, Zhenghao Li, Ruifeng Wang, Tianhui Guo, Wen Gao, Haiji Wang, Biyuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yimiao YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhibo WangDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xiaohui SuDepartment of Galactophore, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zhenghao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ruifeng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Tianhui GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Wen GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Haiji WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Biyuan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To establish a model combining radiomic and clinicopathological factors based on magnetic resonance imaging to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Method: MRI images and clinicopathologic data of 329 eligible breast cancer patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from August 2018 to August 2022 were included in this study. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and imaging examinations were performed before and after NAC. A total of 329 patients were randomly allocated to a training set and a test set at a ratio of 7:3. We mainly studied the following three types of prediction models: radiomic models, clinical models, and clinical-radiomic models. All models were evaluated using subject operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves. Results: The AUCs of the clinical prediction model, independent imaging model and clinical combined imaging model in the training set were 0.864 0.968 and 0.984, and those in the test set were 0.724, 0.754 and 0.877, respectively. According to DCA and calibration curves, the clinical-radiomic model showed good predictive performance in both the training set and the test set, and we found that we had developed a more concise clinical-radiomic nomogram. Conclusion: We have developed a clinical-radiomic model by integrating radiomic features and clinical factors to predict pCR after NAC in breast cancer patients, thereby contributing to the personalized treatment of patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerMRIneoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responseradiomics

Identifiers

PMID38357424
PMCPMC10865896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.