ReviewCureus2024
Assessment of the Efficacy of Circulating Tumor Cells by Liquid Biopsy in the Diagnosis and Prediction of Tumor Behavior of Gliomas: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular switch-mediated detection ofBioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Targeting BRD4-A Promising Therapeutic Option for Glioblastoma?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Exploring Gut Microbiota Alterations with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Dexamethasone in a Humanized Microbiome Mouse Model.Microorganisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the realm of glioma management, the ability to accurately diagnose and predict tumor behavior remains a formidable task. Emerging as a beacon of hope, liquid biopsy (LB), with its potential to detect circulating tumor (CT) cells, offers a novel and promising avenue for addressing these challenges. This systematic review delves into the effectiveness of LB in transforming the landscape of glioma analysis as well as prognosis, shedding light on its clinical significance and implications. We conducted a comprehensive literature search from 2015 to 2023, using multiple sources. We assessed titles and abstracts first, followed by full-text review if they met our criteria. We included those studies that fulfill the inclusion criteria of the study. For bias assessment, we used a two-part tool for specific domains and a quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies. In this review, we incorporated eight studies. A total of 498 patients were identified across eight studies. The average sensitivity was 72.28% in seven of these studies, while the average specificity was 91.52% in the same seven studies. Our review revealed a sensitivity of 72.28% and an impressive specificity of 91.52%. This underscores the potential of LB as a valuable prognostic tool for detecting CT cells. However, the early detection of tumor cells and the prediction of tumor behavior in gliomas continue to be topics of debate, necessitating further research for more precise and reliable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.