Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38357331›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry2023

Effect of direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran on early bone healing: An experimental study in rats.

Ioanna Kyriakaki, Theodora Karanikola, Theodoros Lillis, Eleana Kontonasaki, Nikolaos Dabarakis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ioanna KyriakakiDepartment of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Surgical Implantology and Roentgenology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5628-924X
Theodora KaranikolaPrivate Practice, Clinical Instructor, Department of Oral Surgery, Implantology and Dental Radiology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7798-3258
Theodoros LillisDepartment of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Surgical Implantology and Roentgenology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-8714
Eleana KontonasakiDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7840-4828
Nikolaos DabarakisDepartment of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Surgical Implantology and Roentgenology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2466-160X
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dabigatran belongs to the new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Its advantages are oral administration and no need for international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Although its use has increased, its potential side effects on bone healing and remodeling have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of dabigatran on early bone healing. Methods: Sixteen male Wistar rats were divided into two groups; in group A, 20-mg/kg dabigatran dose was administered orally daily for 15 days, while group B served as a control. Two circular bone defects (d=6 mm) were created on either side of the parietal bones. Two weeks after surgery and euthanasia of the animals, tissue samples (parietal bones that contained the defects) were harvested for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of α=0.5. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the regenerated bone (21.9% vs. 16.3%, Conclusion: Dabigatran did not affect bone regeneration, suggesting that it might be a safer drug compared to older anticoagulants known to lead to bone healing delay.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBone regenerationDabigatranParietal boneWistar rats

Identifiers

PMID38357331
PMCPMC10862050
OpenAlexW4390232227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.