Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356902›Full record

ReviewClinical psychology in Europe2023

Aetiological Understanding of Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Classificatory Analogues: A Systematic Umbrella Review.

Maria Kleinstäuber, Andreas Schröder, Sarah Daehler, Karen Johanne Pallesen, Charlotte U Rask, Mathias Sanyer, Omer Van den Bergh, Marie Weinreich Petersen, Judith G M Rosmalen

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maria Kleinstäuber *Department of Psychology, Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-507X
Andreas Schröder *The Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-4702
Sarah DaehlerDepartment of Psychology, Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0072-3706
Karen Johanne PallesenDanish Centre for Mindfulness, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7543-5891
Charlotte U RaskThe Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-0353
Mathias SanyerDepartment of Psychology, Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4785-2054
Omer Van den BerghDepartment of Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-7363
Marie Weinreich PetersenThe Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8141-2792
Judith G M RosmalenUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-0032
Aarhus University Hospital · DKUtah State University · USAarhus University · DKKU Leuven · BEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This umbrella review systematically assesses the variety and relative dominance of current aetiological views within the scientific literature for the three most investigated symptom-defined functional somatic syndromes (FSS) and their classificatory analogues within psychiatry and psychology. Method: An umbrella review of narrative and systematic reviews with and without meta-analyses based on a search of electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsychINFO) was conducted. Eligible reviews were published in English, focused on research of any kind of aetiological factors in adults diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), and somatic symptom disorder (SSD)/somatoform disorder (SFD). Results: We included 452 reviews (132 systematic reviews including meta-analyses, 133 systematic reviews, 197 narrative reviews), of which 132 (29%) focused on two or more of the investigated health conditions simultaneously. Across diagnoses, biological factors were addressed in 90% (k = 405), psychological in 33% (k = 150), social in 12% (k = 54), and healthcare factors in 5% (k = 23) of the reviews. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews (k = 255) was low (low/critically low: 41% [k = 104]; moderate: 49% [k = 126]; high quality: 10% [k = 25]). The high-quality systematic reviews suggest that deficient conditioned pain modulation, genetic factors, changes in the immune, endocrinological, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and nervous system, and psychosocial factors such as sexual abuse and pain catastrophizing increase the risk for FSS. Conclusion: Only very few systematic reviews have used comprehensive, biopsychosocial disease models to guide the selection of aetiological factors in FSS research. Future research should strive for higher scientific standards and broaden its perspective on these health conditions.

Indexed as

aetiologychronic fatigue syndromefibromyalgiafunctional somatic syndromesirritable bowel syndromemyalgic encephalomyelitissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38356902
PMCPMC10863637
OpenAlexW4387151757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.