ReviewFrontiers in neurology2024
Novel advanced imaging techniques for cerebral oedema.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- White Matter Hyperintensities on Admission CT are Associated with Worse Outcomes But Not Cerebral Edema or Hemorrhagic Transformation After Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- White Matter Hyperintensities on Admission CT Are Associated with Worse Outcomes but not Cerebral Edema or Hemorrhagic Transformation after Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
- Diabetic ketoacidosis and cerebral edema: a rare case of infarct-like MRI findings in a pediatric patient.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Net water uptake combined with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predictive value after successful recanalization in acute large vessel occlusion stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- A CT-based machine learning model for using clinical-radiomics to predict malignant cerebral edema after stroke: a two-center study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral oedema following acute ischemic infarction has been correlated with poor functional outcomes and is the driving mechanism of malignant infarction. Measurements of midline shift and qualitative assessment for herniation are currently the main CT indicators for cerebral oedema but have limited sensitivity for small cortical infarcts and are typically a delayed sign. In contrast, diffusion-weighted (DWI) or T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are highly sensitive but are significantly less accessible. Due to the need for early quantification of cerebral oedema, several novel imaging biomarkers have been proposed. Based on neuroanatomical shift secondary to space-occupying oedema, measures such as relative hemispheric volume and cerebrospinal fluid displacement are correlated with poor outcomes. In contrast, other imaging biometrics, such as net water uptake, T2 relaxometry and blood brain barrier permeability, reflect intrinsic tissue changes from the influx of fluid into the ischemic region. This review aims to discuss quantification of cerebral oedema using current and developing advanced imaging techniques, and their role in predicting clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.