ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Automated detection of MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy with ROI-based morphometric features and machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainable Deep Learning for MRI-Negative Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Classification and Brain Region Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identify MRI negative temporal lobe epilepsy with resting fMRI indicators and machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) predominantly originates from the anteromedial basal region of the temporal lobe, and its prognosis is generally favorable following surgical intervention. However, TLE often appears negative in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), making it difficult to quantitatively diagnose the condition solely based on clinical symptoms. There is a pressing need for a quantitative, automated method for detecting TLE. Methods: This study employed MRI scans and clinical data from 51 retrospective epilepsy cases, dividing them into two groups: 34 patients in TLE group and 17 patients in non-TLE group. The criteria for defining the TLE group were successful surgical removal of the epileptogenic zone in the temporal lobe and a favorable postoperative prognosis. A standard procedure was used for normalization, brain extraction, tissue segmentation, regional brain partitioning, and cortical reconstruction of T1 structural MRI images. Morphometric features such as gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and surface area were extracted from a total of 20 temporal lobe regions in both hemispheres. Support vector machine (SVM), extreme learning machine (ELM), and cmcRVFL+ classifiers were employed for model training and validated using 10-fold cross-validation. Results: The results demonstrated that employing ELM classifiers in conjunction with specific temporal lobe gray matter volume features led to a better identification of TLE. The classification accuracy was 92.79%, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.8019. Conclusion: The method proposed in this study can significantly assist in the preoperative identification of TLE patients. By employing this method, TLE can be included in surgical criteria, which could alleviate patient symptoms and improve prognosis, thereby bearing substantial clinical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.