Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356878›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Insights into refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a comprehensive real-world study.

Yongsheng Zheng, Jianian Hu, Chong Sun, Kai Qiao, Yanyin Zhao, Bingyou Liu, Jian Sun, Jianying Xi, Sushan Luo, Jiahong Lu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yongsheng Zheng *Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianian Hu *Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chong Sun *Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kai QiaoDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanyin ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bingyou LiuDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian SunDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianying XiDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Sushan LuoDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiahong LuDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chongbo ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie LinDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CNHuashan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a challenging subset of CIDP. It does not respond well to immune therapy and causes substantial disability. A comprehensive understanding of its clinical profile, electrophysiological characteristics and potential risk factors associated with refractoriness remains to be further elucidated. Methods: Data in this cross-sectional study was collected and reviewed from the Huashan Peripheral Neuropathy Database (HSPN). Included patients were categorized into refractory CIDP and non-refractory CIDP groups based on treatment response. The clinical and electrophysiological characteristics were compared between refractory and non-refractory CIDP groups. Potential risk factors associated with refractory CIDP were explored with a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: Fifty-eight patients with CIDP were included. Four disease course patterns of refractory CIDP are described: a relapsing-remitting form, a stable form, a secondary progressive form and a primary progressive form. Compared to non-refractory CIDP patients, refractory CIDP exhibited a longer disease duration (48.96 ± 33.72 vs. 28.33 ± 13.72 months, Conclusion: This study provided a comprehensive description of refractory CIDP, addressing its clinical features, classification of clinical course, electrophysiological characteristics, and prognostic factors, effectively elucidating its various aspects. These findings contribute to a better understanding of this challenging subset of CIDP and might be informative for management and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathydisease course formelectrophysiological characteristicsprognosisrefractory

Identifiers

PMID38356878
PMCPMC10865491
OpenAlexW4391387869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.