ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Gender and its association with cardiac defects in down syndrome population at Children Hospital & Institute of Child Health, Lahore, Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whispers of Resilience: A phenomenological exploration of maternal journeys with children affected by Downs Syndrome in Quetta, Baluchistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Demographic Profile and Clinical Characteristics of Adults with Down Syndrome in North-Eastern Romania.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of different congenital cardiac defects co-existing in karyotypically proved Down syndrome population. It also highlighted the association between gender and pattern of congenital cardiac defects and gender as a risk factor. Methods: A cross sectional comparative study was done in the Department of Genetics, Children Hospital Lahore in the year 2017. A total of 160 patients were subjected to karyotypic analysis through blood test for determining the type of Down Syndrome and Echocardiography of all established cases was performed for determining presence and types of congenital cardiac defects. Results were evaluated in terms of establishing co-existence of various cardiac phenotypes in Down Syndrome cases. Results: In karyotypically proven 160 cases of Down syndrome, 58.1% of Down Syndrome cases and 88.2% of Down Syndrome with Congenital Cardiac Defects presented in infancy. The odds ratio (OR) suggested that females are 1.72 times more likely to experience a cardiac effect compared to males. Female gender was potentially associated (p-value 0.07) with occurrence of Patent Ductus Arteriosus (47.8%), whereas VSD (Ventricular Septal Defects) was most prevalent (41.1%) in males. Patent Ductus Arteriosus + Atrial Septal Defects (44.4%) was the commonest cardiac defect in female cases. The combined data for pattern of cardiac anomalies showed no significant association with gender, as indicated by a p-value of 0.990. Conclusion: The study concluded that most of Down syndrome cases and Down syndrome with congenital cardiac defects present to the hospital in infancy. Female cases are more prone to develop cardiac defects as compared to males. The manifestation of PDA (Patent Ductus Arteriosus) was significantly associated as an isolated anomaly in females and VSD (Ventricular Septal Defects) as isolated anomaly in males. Patent Ductus Arteriosus tend to co-exist most with ASD (Atrial Septal Defects) in female cases. Gender was not established as a risk factor for affecting the pattern of cardiac defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.