Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356795›Full record

ReviewAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research

Recent progress of nanomedicine in managing dry eye disease.

Zeen Lv, Su Li, Guixiang Zeng, Ke Yao, Haijie Han

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of 0.05% cyclosporine A on visual quality in patients with Post-refractive surgery dry eye.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CuJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeen LvEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Su LiEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Guixiang ZengDepartment of Pediatrics, No. 903 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Hangzhou, 310013, China.
Ke YaoEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Haijie HanEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Institute on Eye Diseases, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a commonly reported ocular complaint that has garnered significant attention in recent research. The global occurrence of DED ranges from 5% to 50%, impacting a substantial proportion of individuals worldwide with increasing frequency. Although topical administration remains the mainstream drug delivery method for ocular diseases, it suffers from drawbacks such as low bioavailability, rapid drug metabolism, and frequent administration requirements. Fortunately, the advancements in nanomedicine offer effective solutions to address the aforementioned issues and provide significant assistance in the treatment of DED. Main text: DED is considered a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface and tear film, in which the integrity of tear film function and structure plays a crucial role in maintaining the homeostasis of the ocular surface. The conventional treatment for DED involves the utilization of artificial tear products, cyclosporin, corticosteroids, mucin secretagogues, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Furthermore, nanomedicine is presently a significant field of study, with numerous clinical trials underway for various nanotherapeutics including nanoemulsions, nanosuspensions, liposomes, and micelles. Notably, some of these innovative nanoformulations have already received FDA approval as novel remedies for DED, and the advancement of nanomedicine is poised to offer enhanced prospects to solve the shortcomings of existing treatments for DED partially. Conclusions: This article provides an overview of the latest advancements in nanomedicine for DED treatment, while the field of DED treatment is expected to witness a remarkable breakthrough shortly with the development of nanomedicine, bringing promising prospects for patients worldwide suffering conditions.

Indexed as

Drug deliveryDry eye diseaseNanomedicineNanoparticlesOcular surface

Identifiers

PMID38356795
PMCPMC10864857
OpenAlexW4391319351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.