Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356697›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024

The use of race terms in epigenetics research: considerations moving forward.

Dillon E King, Pooja D Lalwani, Gilberto Padilla Mercado, Emma L Dolan, Johnna M Frierson, Joel N Meyer, Susan K Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dillon E KingNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Pooja D LalwaniNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Gilberto Padilla MercadoDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Emma L DolanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Johnna M FriersonIDEALS Office, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Joel N MeyerNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Susan K MurphyNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

Zebrafish as a Detector of Organophosphate ExposureP42ES010356 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AMY H HERRING · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
Social adversities, epigenetics, and the obesity epidemicR01MD011746 · NIMHD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOYO, CATHRINE · 2017 to 2021
$4.4M
Duke University Program in Environmental HealthT32ES021432 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Akhenaton-Andrew Dhafir Jones, Joel Newman Meyer · 2013 to 2026
$4.0M
Southern Liver Health CohortUG3CA265842 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOYO, CATHRINE, MOYLAN, CYNTHIA A · 2021 to 2022
$2.2M
Follow-up and Maintenance of the Newborn Epigenetics STudy (NEST) CohortR24ES028531 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOYO, CATHRINE, MURPHY, SUSAN KAY · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA265842NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010356NIEHS NIH HHS R24 ES028531NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES021432NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of environmental epigenetics is uniquely suited to investigate biologic mechanisms that have the potential to link stressors to health disparities. However, it is common practice in basic epigenetic research to treat race as a covariable in large data analyses in a way that can perpetuate harmful biases without providing any biologic insight. In this article, we i) propose that epigenetic researchers open a dialogue about how and why race is employed in study designs and think critically about how this might perpetuate harmful biases; ii) call for interdisciplinary conversation and collaboration between epigeneticists and social scientists to promote the collection of more detailed social metrics, particularly institutional and structural metrics such as levels of discrimination that could improve our understanding of individual health outcomes; iii) encourage the development of standards and practices that promote full transparency about data collection methods, particularly with regard to race; and iv) encourage the field of epigenetics to continue to investigate how social structures contribute to biological health disparities, with a particular focus on the influence that structural racism may have in driving these health disparities.

Indexed as

data transparencyepigenetic mechanismshealth inequitiesracestructural determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID38356697
PMCPMC10864599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.