Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356692›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Clinical acceptability of automatically generated lymph node levels and structures of deglutition and mastication for head and neck radiation therapy.

Sean Maroongroge, Abdallah Sr Mohamed, Callistus Nguyen, Jean Guma De la Vega, Steven J Frank, Adam S Garden, Brandon G Gunn, Anna Lee, Lauren Mayo, Amy Moreno and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean MaroongrogeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Abdallah Sr MohamedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Callistus NguyenDepartment of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Jean Guma De la VegaDepartment of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Steven J FrankDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Adam S GardenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Brandon G GunnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Anna LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Lauren MayoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Amy MorenoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
William H MorrisonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Jack PhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Michael T SpiottoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Laurence E CourtDepartment of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
David I RosenthalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
Tucker J NethertonDepartment of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Auto-contouring of complex anatomy in computed tomography (CT) scans is a highly anticipated solution to many problems in radiotherapy. In this study, artificial intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring models were clinically validated for lymph node levels and structures of swallowing and chewing in the head and neck. Materials and Methods: CT scans of 145 head and neck radiotherapy patients were retrospectively curated. One cohort (n = 47) was used to analyze seven lymph node levels and the other (n = 98) used to analyze 17 swallowing and chewing structures. Separate nnUnet models were trained and validated using the separate cohorts. For the lymph node levels, preference and clinical acceptability of AI vs human contours were scored. For the swallowing and chewing structures, clinical acceptability was scored. Quantitative analyses of the test sets were performed for AI vs human contours for all structures using overlap and distance metrics. Results: Median Dice Similarity Coefficient ranged from 0.77 to 0.89 for lymph node levels and 0.86 to 0.96 for chewing and swallowing structures. The AI contours were superior to or equally preferred to the manual contours at rates ranging from 75% to 91%; there was not a significant difference in clinical acceptability for nodal levels I-V for manual versus AI contours. Across all AI-generated lymph node level contours, 92% were rated as usable with stylistic to no edits. Of the 340 contours in the chewing and swallowing cohort, 4% required minor edits. Conclusions: An accurate approach was developed to auto-contour lymph node levels and chewing and swallowing structures on CT images for patients with intact nodal anatomy. Only a small portion of test set auto-contours required minor edits.

Indexed as

Chewing and swallowing structuresContouringDeep learningLymph node levelsRadiotherapySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38356692
PMCPMC10864833
OpenAlexW4391481366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.