ArticleHeliyon2024
Assessment of asbestos-cement roof distribution and prioritized intervention approaches through hyperspectral imaging.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Asbestos Vulnerability in Indonesia Using Earthquake Vulnerability.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Computational Methods in the Detection of Asbestos Cement in Hyperspectral Images.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mosses in Urban Environments as Passive Biofilters and Organisms Impacted by Asbestos-Contaminated Habitats.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Article
- Global burden of mesothelioma attributable to occupational asbestos exposure in 204 countries and territories: 1990-2019.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discernment of asbestos-cement (AC) roofs within urban areas stands as a pivotal concern pertinent to communal well-being and ecological oversight, particularly in emerging nations where asbestos continues to be extensively employed. Conventional methodologies entailing the recognition of asbestos-cement roofs and the characterization of their degradation status, such as tangible examinations and laboratory assays, prove to be temporally protracted, financially demanding, and arduous to extrapolate comprehensively across expansive urban domains. In this paper, it is presented a novel approach for identifying asbestos-cement roofs in urban areas using hyperspectral airborne acquisition and carry out a diagnosis that allows to identify the state of asbestos-cement roofs and thus provide a tool for the competent authorities to develop and prioritize intervention strategies to mitigate the problem. Four different methodologies were implemented and compared, three of which are new in the literature, to identify the deterioration of asbestos-cement (AC) roof state in large urban areas. This, in turn, furnishes a tool for competent authorities to identify the state of AC roofs, develop and prioritize intervention strategies to mitigate the problem. The control points in field allowed validating the classification and the proposed methodology for the prioritization of intervention in AC roofs. Some neighborhoods in the city showed peaks in the area of asbestos-cement roofs of 47% of the total area of the neighborhood, representing practically all of the roofs present in the neighborhood. On average around 20% of the total area of a neighborhood in Cartagena is covered by AC. Furthermore, it was found a total area of AC roofs throughout the city of more than 9 km
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.