ArticleHeliyon2024
Improved cell growth on additively manufactured Ti64 substrates with varying porosity and nanofibrous coating.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-printed titanium enhances osteoblastic differentiation and extracellular matrix mineralization: insights from in vitro models.Odontology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Selected Properties of Ti Coatings Deposited on MED610 for Medical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- 3D printing combined with thermally induced phase separation for engineering hierarchical osteogenic PLA scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3T3 Swiss albino mouse cells are often used in biotechnological applications. These cells can grow adherently on suitable surfaces. In our study, they were grown on different titanium substrates, comparing commercially available titanium sheets of grade 1 and grade 2, respectively, with Ti64 which was 3D printed with different porosity in order to identify potential substitutes for common well-plates, which could - in case of 3D printed substrates - be produced in various shapes and dimensions and thus broaden the range of substrates for cell growth in biotechnology and tissue engineering. In addition, thin layers of poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) nanofibers were electrospun on these substrates to add a nanostructure. The common titanium sheets showed lower cell cover factors than common well plates, which could not be improved by the thin nanofibrous coating. However, the Ti sheets with nanofiber mat coatings showed higher cell adhesion and proliferation than pure PAN nanofiber mats. The 3D printed Ti64 substrates prepared by laser metal fusion, on the other hand, enabled significantly higher proliferation of (66 ± 8)% cover factor after three days of cell growth than well plates which are usually applied as the gold standard for cell cultivation ((48 ± 11)% cover factor under identical conditions). Especially the Ti64 samples with higher porosity showed high cell adhesion and proliferation. Our study suggests investigating such porous Ti64 samples further as a potential future optimum for cell adhesion and proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.