Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356536›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A Bayesian decision support system for optimizing pavement management programs.

Babitha Philip, Hamad AlJassmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Babitha PhilipDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain, P.O.Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Hamad AlJassmiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain, P.O.Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over time, the pavement deteriorates due to traffic and the environment, resulting in poor riding quality and structural inadequacies. Evaluating pavement condition over time is thus a critical component of any pavement management system (PMS) to extend the service life of pavements. However, the uncertainty associated with the pavement deterioration process due to the heterogeneous nature of the pavement degradation factors makes the process difficult. The current work addresses this challenge of pavement management by developing an expert system framework based on Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN). This framework integrates data on existing road deterioration factors with knowledge gained from pavement experts to produce optimal decisions. The advantages of the BBN techniques lie in their ability to capture uncertainty, and probabilistically infer the values of variables in the domain, especially in the case of incomplete information where we only have data about some and not all variables. This has motivated the adoption of BBN in this study to optimize pavement maintenance decisions, on the basis of inferred road deterioration interpretations drawn from partial knowledge about road distress variables. This study presents the adoption of Bayesian methods to assist pavement maintenance engineers in determining the most successful and efficient maintenance and repair (M&R) tactics and the best time to apply them by means of a decision-support system. Data collected from 32 road sections in the United Arab Emirates in relation to road distress parameters (rutting, deflection, cracking, and international roughness index), as well as road characteristics, traffic, and environment data, has been used to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed decision-support tool.

Indexed as

Bayesian belief networksDecision-supportMachine-learningUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID38356536
PMCPMC10865306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.