Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356514›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Efficacy of combined HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs screening in minimizing transfusion transmission risk of hepatitis B infection in low resource setting.

Shreyasi Athalye, Amruta Patil, Naveen Khargekar, Shailesh Shinde, Shreya Chavan, Abhay Dixit, Aruna Shankarkumar, Manisha Madkaikar, Anindita Banerjee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shreyasi AthalyeTransfusion Transmission Disease Department, ICMR- National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India.
Amruta PatilDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, MGM Institute of Health Sciences, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Naveen KhargekarHematogenetics Department, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India.
Shailesh ShindeTransfusion Transmission Disease Department, ICMR- National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India.
Shreya ChavanTransfusion Transmission Disease Department, ICMR- National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India.
Abhay DixitProject ACCELERATE, YRGCARE, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Aruna ShankarkumarTransfusion Transmission Disease Department, ICMR- National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India.
Manisha MadkaikarPaediatric Immunology and Leukocyte Biology, ICMR- National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India.
Anindita BanerjeeTransfusion Transmission Disease Department, ICMR- National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012, India.
ICMR - National Institute of Immunohaemotology · INMahatma Gandhi Mission Institute of Health Sciences · INYR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), and occult Hepatitis B in particular, is a major concern in the transfusion scenario, especially in endemic countries. This study attempted to estimate the prevalence of occult Hepatitis B infection (OBI) among voluntary blood donors in Maharashtra and to evaluate the role of combined screening strategy with implications in minimizing the current transfusion risks of seropositive OBI. Methods: Donor samples were collected from 80 eligible blood banks from various districts of Maharashtra between 2014 and 2017. ELISA based screening of HBsAg, anti-HBc (total and IgM), anti-HBs titres. Real-time quantitative PCR for Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) were performed for all HBsAg and or anti-HBc positive samples. Results: Out of 2398 samples tested, 20 (0.83%) samples were positive for HBsAg, whereas 547 (22.81%) were positive for anti-HBc. Out of 547 samples, 16 (2.92%) were positive for HBV DNA with median level at 247.89 IU/mL (IQR: 126.05-666.67 IU/mL). Anti-HBs levels were positive in 35.83% of OBI cases. ROC curve analysis showed that combined HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs (>50 mIU/mL) screening can more efficiently detect HBV infection in blood donors than HBsAg alone. Conclusions: A combined HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs screening for donor samples could be an alternative achievable strategy to minimize the HBV transmission as well as financial burden. In resource limited setup, the proposed combined strategy could be helpful in minimizing the risk of OBI transmission.

Indexed as

anti-HBc screeningBlood safetyHepatitis B virusOBI transmissionOccult hepatitis B

Identifiers

PMID38356514
PMCPMC10865305
OpenAlexW4391514365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.