Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356463›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2024

Selinexor, daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results of the phase II, nonrandomized, multicenter GEM-SELIBORDARA study.

Verónica González-Calle, Paula Rodríguez-Otero, Anna Sureda, Felipe De Arriba, Marta Reinoso, Paz Ribas, Ana Pilar González-Rodríguez, Yolanda González, Albert Oriol, Joaquín Martínez-López and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Monoclonal Antibodies in Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Verónica González-CalleDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (CAUSA/IBSAL) and Center for Biomedical Research in Network of Cancer (CIBERONC), Salamanca.
Paula Rodríguez-OteroCancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CIMA; IDISNA; CIBERONC, Pamplona. paurodriguez@unav.es.
Anna SuredaServe d'Hematologia Clínica, Institut Català D'Oncologia-L'Hospitalet. IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.
Felipe De ArribaHospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia.
Marta ReinosoHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla.
Paz RibasHospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia.
Ana Pilar González-RodríguezHospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo.
Yolanda GonzálezInstitut Catalá D'Oncologia Girona, Girona.
Albert OriolInstitut Catalá D'Oncologia Badalona, Badalona.
Joaquín Martínez-LópezHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
Marta Sonia GonzálezComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, La Coruña.
Miguel T HernándezHospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife.
Maialen SirventHospital Donostia, San Sebastián.
Teresa CedenaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
Noemí PuigDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (CAUSA/IBSAL) and Center for Biomedical Research in Network of Cancer (CIBERONC), Salamanca.
Bruno PaivaCancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CIMA; IDISNA; CIBERONC, Pamplona.
Joan BladéHospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona.
Juan José LahuertaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid.
Jesús F San-MiguelCancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CIMA; IDISNA; CIBERONC, Pamplona.
María-Victoria MateosDepartment of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (CAUSA/IBSAL) and Center for Biomedical Research in Network of Cancer (CIBERONC), Salamanca.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma has significantly evolved in the last decade. Notwithstanding, a large proportion of patients continue to relapse and novel combinations continue to be needed. In this phase II study, selinexor, a first-in-class inhibitor of exportin-1 was evaluated in combination with standard daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (DVd), for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The aim of the trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of selinexor with DVd (S-DVd). A total of 57 patients were enrolled in the two parts of the study. Part 1 enrolled a heavily pretreated population with at least three prior lines (PL) of therapy and part 2 enrolled an early relapse population with at least one PL of therapy. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate in part 2 and overall response rate (ORR) in part 1. In the latter, 24 patients were treated with a median of three PL. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50% with two CR. Median progression- free survival (PFS) was 7 months. In part 2, 33 patients were enrolled, with a median of one PL. ORR was 82% and CR or better was 33%. Median PFS was 24 months. In lenalidomide-refractory patients, a median PFS of 22.1 months was observed. Thrombocytopenia was the most common hematological adverse event (69%; grade 3-4: 34%) and nausea, the most frequent non-hematological adverse event (38%; grade 3-4: 6%). Sixty-two percent of the patients required dose modifications. In summary, although the primary endpoint of the study was not met, the combination of S-DVd showed encouraging clinical efficacy with a generally manageable safety profile representing a potential option for the treatment of RRMM patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibDexamethasoneHydrazinesMultiple MyelomaTriazolesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceAntibodies, MonoclonalBortezomibdaratumumabDexamethasoneHydrazinesselinexorTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID38356463
PMCPMC11215366
OpenAlexW4391841288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.