Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38356351›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2024

Fetomaternal outcomes in pregnant women with congenital heart disease: a comparative analysis from an apex institute.

Soniya Dhiman, Aparna Sharma, Akanksha Gupta, Richa Vatsa, Juhi Bharti, Vidushi Kulshrestha, Satyavir Yadav, Vatsla Dadhwal, Neena Malhotra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soniya DhimanDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Aparna SharmaDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Akanksha GuptaDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Richa VatsaDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Juhi BhartiDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Vidushi KulshresthaDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Satyavir YadavDepartments of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Vatsla DadhwalDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
Neena MalhotraDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith advancements in cardiac surgical interventions during infancy and childhood, the incidence of maternal congenital heart disease (CHD) is increasing. This retrospective study compared fetal and cardiac outcomes in women with and without CHD, along with a sub-analysis between cyanotic versus non-cyanotic defects and operated versus non-operated cases.

methodsA 10-year data were retrospectively collected from pregnant women with CHD and a 1:1 ratio of pregnant women without any heart disease. Adverse fetal and cardiac outcomes were noted in both groups. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

resultsA total of 86 pregnant women with CHD were studied, with atrial septal defects (29.06%) being the most common. Out of 86 participants, 27 (31.39%) had cyanotic CHD. Around 55% of cases were already operated on for their cardiac defects. Among cardiovascular complications, 5.8% suffered from heart failure, 7.0% had pulmonary arterial hypertension, 8.1% presented in New York Heart Association functional class IV, 9.3% had a need for intensive care unit admission, and one experienced maternal mortality. Adverse fetal outcomes, including operative vaginal delivery, mean duration of hospital stay, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth (<37 weeks), low birth weight (<2,500 g), 5-minute APGAR score <7, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions, were significantly higher in women with CHD than in women without heart disease.

conclusionWomen with CHD have a higher risk of adverse fetal and cardiac outcomes. The outcome can be improved with proper pre-conceptional optimization of the cardiac condition, good antenatal care, and multidisciplinary team management.

Indexed as

High-risk pregnancyIntrauterine growth restrictionPreconception carePremature birthvascular disease

Identifiers

PMID38356351
PMCPMC10948205
OpenAlexW4391842796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.