Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355958›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2024

The experience of receiving a letter from a cancer genetics clinic about risk for hereditary cancer.

Anna Öfverholm, Per Karlsson, Anna Rosén

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Looking back at 2024 in the European Journal of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Novel insights into cancer predisposition genes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna ÖfverholmInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden. anna.ofverholm@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1883-1924
Per KarlssonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4841-2672
Anna RosénDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2441-2395
University of Gothenburg · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) 2022-1177Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2022-02226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct contact may be an option for supporting disclosure in families with hereditary cancer risk. In this qualitative interview study, we explored how healthy at-risk relatives experience receiving a letter with information about hereditary cancer directly from healthcare rather than via a relative. The study is part of an ongoing multicentre randomised clinical trial in Sweden that evaluates the effectiveness of direct letters from cancer genetics clinics to at-risk relatives. After conducting semi-structured interviews with 14 relatives who had received a letter and contacted the clinic, we analysed the data using thematic analysis. The relatives had different levels of prior knowledge about the hereditary cancer assessment. Many had been notified by family that a letter was coming but some had not. Overall, these participants believed healthcare-mediated disclosure could complement family-mediated disclosure. They expressed that the letter and the message raised concerns and a need for counselling, and they wanted healthcare to be accessible and informed when making contact. The participants found the message easier to cope with when they had been notified by a family member beforehand, with a general attitude that notifying relatives was the appropriate step to take. They thought healthcare should help patients with the disclosure process but also guard the right of at-risk relatives to be informed. The findings support a direct approach from healthcare as a possible complement to an established model of family-mediated risk disclosure, but implementation must be made within existing frameworks of good practice for genetic counselling.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedFamilyFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSweden

Identifiers

PMID38355958
PMCPMC11061288
OpenAlexW4391817582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.