ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2024
The experience of receiving a letter from a cancer genetics clinic about risk for hereditary cancer.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct letters to relatives at risk of hereditary cancer-a randomised trial on healthcare-assisted versus family-mediated risk disclosure.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Trial
- Public attitudes toward cascade genetic screening in the United States.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Familial Disclosure and Cascade Testing in High-Risk Families is Influenced by Gene Variant Penetrance: Implications for Family based Breast Cancer Prevention.Research square · 2026Article
- Predictive genetic testing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): Experiences of decision-making and engagement with UK genetic counseling services.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Patients' perspectives regarding health professionals contacting their relatives about genetic risk directly (with patient consent).European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Looking back at 2024 in the European Journal of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Genomic findings with familial implications: agenda setting in light of mainstreaming.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Health System-Led Early Consent and Direct Contact of At-Risk Relatives: Pilot Study Results.Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Who has the responsibility to inform relatives at risk of hereditary cancer? A population-based survey in Sweden.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Commentary: Why is genetic testing underutilized worldwide? The case for hereditary breast cancer.BJC reports · 2024Review
- Novel insights into cancer predisposition genes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- National Experiences from 30 Years of Provider-Mediated Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome Families-The Danish Model.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Direct contact may be an option for supporting disclosure in families with hereditary cancer risk. In this qualitative interview study, we explored how healthy at-risk relatives experience receiving a letter with information about hereditary cancer directly from healthcare rather than via a relative. The study is part of an ongoing multicentre randomised clinical trial in Sweden that evaluates the effectiveness of direct letters from cancer genetics clinics to at-risk relatives. After conducting semi-structured interviews with 14 relatives who had received a letter and contacted the clinic, we analysed the data using thematic analysis. The relatives had different levels of prior knowledge about the hereditary cancer assessment. Many had been notified by family that a letter was coming but some had not. Overall, these participants believed healthcare-mediated disclosure could complement family-mediated disclosure. They expressed that the letter and the message raised concerns and a need for counselling, and they wanted healthcare to be accessible and informed when making contact. The participants found the message easier to cope with when they had been notified by a family member beforehand, with a general attitude that notifying relatives was the appropriate step to take. They thought healthcare should help patients with the disclosure process but also guard the right of at-risk relatives to be informed. The findings support a direct approach from healthcare as a possible complement to an established model of family-mediated risk disclosure, but implementation must be made within existing frameworks of good practice for genetic counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.