ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024
ICP wave morphology as a screening test to exclude intracranial hypertension in brain-injured patients: a non-invasive perspective.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Novel Non-invasive Technique of Cerebral Compliance and Auto-regulation Assessment
Brain Skull Deformation as a Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Measure: Comparison Between Invasive and Noninvasive Methods.
A Multicenter Observational Cohort for the Determination of Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Waveforms Role in Traumatic Brain Injury
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Neurological and Hemodynamics Safety of an Airway Clearance Technique in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: An Analysis of Intracranial Pressure Pulse Morphology Using a Non-Invasive Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Trial
- Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Waveform Assessment as a Screening Test for Abnormal Lumbar Puncture Results.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Intracranial Pressure Estimation Using B4C Device: A Systematic Review on the Validation Studies.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Practicalities of noninvasive neuromonitoring in intensive care.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimation in the intensive care unit: narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are available in the care of acute brain injured patients: a clinical approach.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Performance of Intracranial Pressure Waveform Morphological Features as Biomarkers of Intracranial Hypertension.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Impact of hemodynamic management guided by intracranial compliance on the outcome of critically ill patients - preliminary results and exploratory economic evaluation.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring using optic nerve sheath diameter and the Brain4Care system.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in management of slit ventricle syndrome-case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance of the Brain4care System for Noninvasive Detection of Intracranial Hypertension.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Low-Cost Strategies for the Development of Neurocritical Care in Resource-Limited Settings.Neurocritical care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial hypertension (IH) is a life-threating condition especially for the brain injured patient. In such cases, an external ventricular drain (EVD) or an intraparenchymal bolt are the conventional gold standard for intracranial pressure (ICPi) monitoring. However, these techniques have several limitations. Therefore, identifying an ideal screening method for IH is important to avoid the unnecessary placement of ICPi and expedite its introduction in patients who require it. A potential screening tool is the ICP wave morphology (ICPW) which changes according to the intracranial volume-pressure curve. Specifically, the P2/P1 ratio of the ICPW has shown promise as a triage test to indicate normal ICP. In this study, we propose evaluating the noninvasive ICPW (nICPW-B4C sensor) as a screening method for ICPi monitoring in patients with moderate to high probability of IH. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter study that recruited adult patients requiring ICPi monitoring from both Federal University of São Paulo and University of São Paulo Medical School Hospitals. ICPi values and the nICPW parameters were obtained from both the invasive and the noninvasive methods simultaneously 5 min after the closure of the EVD drainage. ICP assessment was performed using a catheter inserted into the ventricle and connected to a pressure transducer and a drainage system. The B4C sensor was positioned on the patient's scalp without the need for trichotomy, surgical incision or trepanation, and the morphology of the ICP waves acquired through a strain sensor that can detect and monitor skull bone deformations caused by changes in ICP. All patients were monitored using this noninvasive system for at least 10 min per session. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to describe discriminatory power of the P2/P1 ratio for IH, with emphasis in the Negative Predictive value (NPV), based on the Youden index, and the negative likelihood ratio [LR-]. Recruitment occurred from August 2017 to March 2020. A total of 69 patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria in the two centers and a total of 111 monitorizations were performed. The mean P2/P1 ratio value in the sample was 1.12. The mean P2/P1 value in the no IH population was 1.01 meanwhile in the IH population was 1.32 (p < 0.01). The best Youden index for the mean P2/P1 ratio was with a cut-off value of 1.13 showing a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 60%, and a NPV of 97%, as well as an AUC of 0.83 to predict IH. With the 1.13 cut-off value for P2/P1 ratio, the LR- for IH was 0.11, corresponding to a strong performance in ruling out the condition (IH), with an approximate 45% reduction in condition probability after a negative test (ICPW). To conclude, the P2/P1 ratio of the noninvasive ICP waveform showed in this study a high Negative Predictive Value and Likelihood Ratio in different acute neurological conditions to rule out IH. As a result, this parameter may be beneficial in situations where invasive methods are not feasible or unavailable and to screen high-risk patients for potential invasive ICP monitoring.Trial registration: At clinicaltrials.gov under numbers NCT05121155 (Registered 16 November 2021-retrospectively registered) and NCT03144219 (Registered 30 September 2022-retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.