Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355918›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

ICP wave morphology as a screening test to exclude intracranial hypertension in brain-injured patients: a non-invasive perspective.

Fabiano Moulin de Moraes, Sérgio Brasil, Gustavo Frigieri, Chiara Robba, Wellingson Paiva, Gisele Sampaio Silva

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03144219 unknown statusnot on this map

A Novel Non-invasive Technique of Cerebral Compliance and Auto-regulation Assessment

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2017 to 2023Enrolled133ConditionsIntracranial HypertensionArmsTranscranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound monitoring, Non invasive intracranial compliance monitoring
NCT05121155 completednot on this map

Brain Skull Deformation as a Non-invasive Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Measure: Comparison Between Invasive and Noninvasive Methods.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFederal University of São PauloRan2019 to 2020Enrolled18ConditionsSubarachnoid Hemorrhage, Stroke, Stroke, Ischemic, Stroke HemorrhagicArmsICP wave morphology comparison between a non-invasive (Brain4care) and a invasive method
NCT06423469 completednot on this map

A Multicenter Observational Cohort for the Determination of Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Waveforms Role in Traumatic Brain Injury

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSergio Brasil, MDRan2020 to 2024Enrolled345ConditionsTraumatic Brain InjuryArmsNoninvasive ICP monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in management of slit ventricle syndrome-case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabiano Moulin de MoraesDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. fabianomoulin@yahoo.com.br.
Sérgio BrasilDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo FrigieriMedical Investigation Laboratory 62, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Chiara RobbaAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS Per L'Oncologia E Le Neuroscienze, Genoa, Italy.
Wellingson PaivaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gisele Sampaio SilvaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BROspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial hypertension (IH) is a life-threating condition especially for the brain injured patient. In such cases, an external ventricular drain (EVD) or an intraparenchymal bolt are the conventional gold standard for intracranial pressure (ICPi) monitoring. However, these techniques have several limitations. Therefore, identifying an ideal screening method for IH is important to avoid the unnecessary placement of ICPi and expedite its introduction in patients who require it. A potential screening tool is the ICP wave morphology (ICPW) which changes according to the intracranial volume-pressure curve. Specifically, the P2/P1 ratio of the ICPW has shown promise as a triage test to indicate normal ICP. In this study, we propose evaluating the noninvasive ICPW (nICPW-B4C sensor) as a screening method for ICPi monitoring in patients with moderate to high probability of IH. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter study that recruited adult patients requiring ICPi monitoring from both Federal University of São Paulo and University of São Paulo Medical School Hospitals. ICPi values and the nICPW parameters were obtained from both the invasive and the noninvasive methods simultaneously 5 min after the closure of the EVD drainage. ICP assessment was performed using a catheter inserted into the ventricle and connected to a pressure transducer and a drainage system. The B4C sensor was positioned on the patient's scalp without the need for trichotomy, surgical incision or trepanation, and the morphology of the ICP waves acquired through a strain sensor that can detect and monitor skull bone deformations caused by changes in ICP. All patients were monitored using this noninvasive system for at least 10 min per session. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to describe discriminatory power of the P2/P1 ratio for IH, with emphasis in the Negative Predictive value (NPV), based on the Youden index, and the negative likelihood ratio [LR-]. Recruitment occurred from August 2017 to March 2020. A total of 69 patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria in the two centers and a total of 111 monitorizations were performed. The mean P2/P1 ratio value in the sample was 1.12. The mean P2/P1 value in the no IH population was 1.01 meanwhile in the IH population was 1.32 (p < 0.01). The best Youden index for the mean P2/P1 ratio was with a cut-off value of 1.13 showing a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 60%, and a NPV of 97%, as well as an AUC of 0.83 to predict IH. With the 1.13 cut-off value for P2/P1 ratio, the LR- for IH was 0.11, corresponding to a strong performance in ruling out the condition (IH), with an approximate 45% reduction in condition probability after a negative test (ICPW). To conclude, the P2/P1 ratio of the noninvasive ICP waveform showed in this study a high Negative Predictive Value and Likelihood Ratio in different acute neurological conditions to rule out IH. As a result, this parameter may be beneficial in situations where invasive methods are not feasible or unavailable and to screen high-risk patients for potential invasive ICP monitoring.Trial registration: At clinicaltrials.gov under numbers NCT05121155 (Registered 16 November 2021-retrospectively registered) and NCT03144219 (Registered 30 September 2022-retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesIntracranial HypertensionAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesROC CurveComputed tomographyICP wave morphologyIntracranial complianceIntracranial pressureNeuro-ICUNoninvasive intracranial pressure monitorStrokeSubarachnoid hemorrhageTranscranial Doppler

Identifiers

PMID38355918
OpenAlexW4391807899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.