Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38355898›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A cohort study of neurodevelopmental disorders and/or congenital anomalies using high resolution chromosomal microarrays in southern Brazil highlighting the significance of ASD.

Tiago Fernando Chaves, Maristela Ocampos, Ingrid Tremel Barbato, Louise Lapagesse de Camargo Pinto, Gisele Rozone de Luca, Jorge Humberto Barbato Filho, Priscila Bernardi, Yara Costa Netto Muniz, Angelica Francesca Maris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tiago Fernando ChavesLaboratório de Polimorfismos Genéticos (LAPOGE), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. tiagochavo@msn.com.
Maristela OcamposLaboratory Neurogene (former), Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
Ingrid Tremel BarbatoLaboratory Neurogene, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Louise Lapagesse de Camargo PintoChildren's Hospital Joana de Gusmão, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Gisele Rozone de LucaChildren's Hospital Joana de Gusmão, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Jorge Humberto Barbato FilhoLaboratory Neurogene, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Priscila BernardiUniversity Hospital Professor Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Yara Costa Netto MunizLaboratório de Polimorfismos Genéticos (LAPOGE), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Angelica Francesca MarisUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. afmaris@gmail.com.
Engene (Brazil) · BRHospital Infantil Joana de Gusmão · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRPolydoro Ernani de São Thiago University Hospital · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88882.438509/2019-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is the reference in evaluation of copy number variations (CNVs) in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which affect around 3-4% of the world's population. Modern platforms for CMA, also include probes for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that detect homozygous regions in the genome, such as long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH). These regions result from complete or segmental chromosomal homozygosis and may be indicative of uniparental disomy (UPD), inbreeding, population characteristics, as well as replicative DNA repair events. In this retrospective study, we analyzed CMA reading files requested by geneticists and neurologists for diagnostic purposes along with available clinical data. Our objectives were interpreting CNVs and assess the frequencies and implications of LCSH detected by Affymetrix CytoScan HD (41%) or 750K (59%) platforms in 1012 patients from the south of Brazil. The patients were mainly children with NDDs and/or congenital anomalies (CAs). A total of 206 CNVs, comprising 132 deletions and 74 duplications, interpreted as pathogenic, were found in 17% of the patients in the cohort and across all chromosomes. Additionally, 12% presented rare variants of uncertain clinical significance, including LPCNVs, as the only clinically relevant CNV. Within the realm of NDDs, ASD carries a particular importance, owing to its escalating prevalence and its growing repercussions for individuals, families, and communities. ASD was one clinical phenotype, if not the main reason for referral to testing, for about one-third of the cohort, and these patients were further analyzed as a sub-cohort. Considering only the patients with ASD, the diagnostic rate was 10%, within the range reported in the literature (8-21%). It was higher (16%) when associated with dysmorphic features and lower (7%) for "isolated" ASD (without ID and without dysmorphic features). In 953 CMAs of the whole cohort, LCSH (≥ 3 Mbp) were analyzed not only for their potential pathogenic significance but were also explored to identify common LCSH in the South Brazilians population. CMA revealed at least one LCSH in 91% of the patients. For about 11.5% of patients, the LCSH suggested consanguinity from the first to the fifth degree, with a greater probability of clinical impact, and in 2.8%, they revealed a putative UPD. LCSH found at a frequency of 5% or more were considered common LCSH in the general population, allowing us to delineate 10 regions as potentially representing ancestral haplotypes of neglectable clinical significance. The main referrals for CMA were developmental delay (56%), ID (33%), ASD (33%) and syndromic features (56%). Some phenotypes in this population may be predictive of a higher probability of indicating a carrier of a pathogenic CNV. Here, we present the largest report of CMA data in a cohort with NDDs and/or CAs from the South of Brazil. We characterize the rare CNVs found along with the main phenotypes presented by each patient and show the importance and usefulness of LCSH interpretation in CMA results that incorporate SNPs, as well as we illustrate the value of CMA to investigate CNV in ASD.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderIntellectual DisabilityNeurodevelopmental DisordersSouth American PeopleBrazilChildChromosomesCohort StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansRetrospective StudiesUniparental DisomyAutismBrazilChromosomal microarraysCongenital anomaliesCopy number variationsLCSHNeurodevelopmental disorders

Identifiers

PMID38355898
PMCPMC10867078
OpenAlexW4391806720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.